The perception of reproducibility in a small cohort of scientists in Europe
Open Access
- 23 June 2021
- journal article
- Published by Portico in Neuroanatomy and Behaviour
- Vol. 3, e20
- https://doi.org/10.35430/nab.2021.e20
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is replication?PLoS Biology, 2020
- No Support for Historical Candidate Gene or Candidate Gene-by-Interaction Hypotheses for Major Depression Across Multiple Large SamplesAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2019
- Plan to replicate 50 high-impact cancer papers shrinks to just 18Science, 2018
- Do Neuroscience Journals Accept Replications? A Survey of LiteratureFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017
- Are Psychology Journals Anti-replication? A Snapshot of Editorial PracticesFrontiers in Psychology, 2017
- Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging researchNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2017
- How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?PLOS ONE, 2016
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological scienceScience, 2015
- An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology researcheLife, 2014
- Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social SciencesReview of General Psychology, 2009