Eliciting Value-Judgments in Health Technology Assessment: An Applied Ethics Decision Making Paradigm
Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scientific Research Publishing, Inc. in Open Journal of Philosophy
- Vol. 11 (02), 307-325
- https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2021.112021
Abstract
The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has shed more light on the difficulty of making health care decisions integrating scientific knowledge and values associated to life and death issues, human suffering, quality of life, economic losses, liberty of movement, etc. But the difficulties related to health care decisions and the use of innovative drugs or technologies are not new, and many countries have created agencies that have the mandate to evaluate new technologies in health care. Health Technological Assessment (HTA) reports’ aim is to guide the decision makers in these difficult matters. There are two ethical components in HTA. The first is the report’s presentation of an ethical evaluation of the technology. The second is the value-ladenness of the HTA decision-making process itself. When implicit value judgments are not elicited, the justification of the final decision cannot be transparent. The present paper aims to identify and elicit the implicit value-judgments related to each step of the HTA process. This research is grounded on an applied ethics decision-making paradigm based on the role of value judgments in the decision-making process. The first part discusses two different approaches to values and value judgments in HTA. In the second part, citations mentioning value judgments extracted from a systematic review on the integration of ethics into HTA were categorized to elicit the value judgments and their criteria for each different HTA decision-making steps. The results show that there are 18 decision-making steps in the HTA process where 23 implicit value-judgments can be recognized. The range of these value judgments encompasses the whole HTA process: from the initial request, the presenting of the principal issues, to the final report’s dissemination. Since stakeholders need to understand which value judgments the conclusion of a report relies on, eliciting the implicit value judgments in the HTA decision-making process should yield more transparency.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethical health technology assessment in Latin America: lessons from Canada and ArgentinaActa bioethica, 2011
- Different methods for ethical analysis in health technology assessment: An empirical studyInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011
- Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed frameworkInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011
- Improving ethics analysis in health technology assessmentInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011
- Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: A descriptive reviewInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2009
- Why ethics should be part of health technology assessmentInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2008
- Ethical analysis to improve decision-making on health technologiesBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2008
- Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Ethics and HTA: some lessons and challenges for the futurePoiesis & Praxis, 2004
- BEST PRACTICE IN UNDERTAKING AND REPORTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTSInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2002