How many RPAS can be safely integrated in non–segregated airspace?
Open Access
- 17 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by EDP Sciences in MATEC Web of Conferences
- Vol. 304, 05003
- https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201930405003
Abstract
The forthcoming integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) is one of the cmost omplex challenges for aviation. Europe draws to allow operating RPAS and conventional aircraft in non-segregated airspace by 2025, but this demanding perspective entails a thorough analysis of the different aspects involved. The RPAS integration in non-segregated airspace cannot imply an increase in the safety levels. This paper assesses how the RPAS integration affects safety levels. The goal is to regulate the number of RPAS that can jointly operate with conventional aircraft regarding conflict risk. This approach benchmarks a Calculated Level of Safety (CLS) with a Target Level of Safety (TLS). Monte Carlo (MC) simulations quantify the TLS based on schedules of conventional aircraft. Then, different combinations of conventional aircraft and RPAS provide different CLS. MC simulations are performed based on probabilistic distributions of aircraft performances, entry times and geographical distribution of aircraft. The safety levels are based on a conflict-risk model because the primary metrics are average number of conflicts and average conflict duration. The methodology is applied to one flight level of en-route airspace. The results provide restrictions to the number of RPAS that can jointly operate with conventional aircraft. Particularly, the TLS is quantified for four conventional aircraft and MC simulations provide the combinations of conventional aircraft and RPAS that fulfil the CLS. The same number of RPAS than conventional aircraft shows an increase over 90% average number of conflicts and 300% average conflict time.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- UAV collision avoidance exploitation for noncooperative trajectory modificationAerospace Science and Technology, 2018
- Conflict-Free Trajectory Planning Based on a Data-Driven Conflict-Resolution ModelJournal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017
- Structuring the safety case for unmanned aircraft system operations in non-segregated airspaceSafety Science, 2015
- Collision avoidance for UAVs using reachable setsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2015
- A novel algorithm for distant aircraft detectionPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2015
- Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of DronesRisk Analysis, 2015
- A third-party casualty risk model for unmanned aircraft system operationsReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014
- Route planner for unmanned aerial system insertion in civil non-segregated airspaceProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2012
- Definition of an airworthiness certification framework for civil unmanned aircraft systemsSafety Science, 2011
- On unmanned aircraft systems issues, challenges and operational restrictions preventing integration into the National Airspace SystemProgress in Aerospace Sciences, 2008