From feeding-back to feeding-forward: managerial feedback as a trigger of change in SMEs
Open Access
- 11 February 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
- Vol. 26 (1), 18-42
- https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-01-2018-0034
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore and theorize the process of managerial feedback in relation to change in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This research embraces a qualitative methodology in the context of manufacturing SMEs. Drawing on 30 in-depth interviews, and observations conducted with various managers in six SMEs operating in three countries, it is argued that managers benefit more by using daily, ongoing, feedback as a trigger of change in their organizations. The findings suggest that there is an overall view that managers appear to be reluctant to change existing processes using formalized feedback mechanisms, which runs counter-intuitive to the literature. In contrast, informal methods of feedback work better in enhancing organizational change. Moreover, another two features of feedback enhance this process, namely, benefits oriented and confidence oriented. As such, this study contributes to existing knowledge and practice by proposing a three-fold form of feedback through which managers expand their perspectives of feedback from feeding-back to feeding-forward thereby enhancing the opportunities of triggering change. Feedback should merely be considered as a dynamic and socially constructed managerial practice. A practice where actors not only exchange information and share knowledge, but also act, react and interact with each other as they constantly rethinking the change process. The proposed aspect of feedback emphasizes knowledge therapeutically and in combination with the dialogical discourse (practical illustration) that increases the odds for capturing change as a natural, rather than exceptional. Practitioners, as such, may wish to consider the terminology used when it comes to studying change and its implementation in a crisis context. Using deformalized managerial feedback mechanisms to tackle a formal phenomenon like “change” could help avoid employees perceiving a negative connotation, causing resistance or confusion and feeling threatened. Therefore, the authors suggest that practitioners, during development initiatives on modernizing or altering organizational processes, consider replacing the term “change” as a formal concept. It is an investigation from an exploratory perspective in studying and understanding the causes, factors and modalities that trigger managerial feedback toward organizational change in manufacturing SMEs.Keywords
This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- LearninginCrisisJournal of Management Inquiry, 2013
- ‘Evidence Based Management’, or ‘Evidence Oriented Organizing’? A critical realist perspectiveOrganization, 2012
- Wild capitalism, privatisation and employment relations in SerbiaEmployee Relations: The International Journal, 2011
- The Mediating Role of Appraisal Feedback Reactions on the Relationship Between Rater Feedback-Related Behaviors and Ratee PerformanceGroup & Organization Management, 2010
- Beyond Collective Entities: Multilevel Research on Organizational Routines and CapabilitiesJournal of Management, 2010
- Conversational ProfilesThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2008
- Towards a better understanding of the link between participation in decision‐making and organizational citizenship behaviour: A multilevel analysisJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 1999
- CAN MULTI‐SOURCE FEEDBACK CHANGE PERCEPTIONS OF GOAL ACCOMPLISHMENT, SELF‐EVALUATIONS, AND PERFORMANCE‐RELATED OUTCOMES? THEORY‐BASED APPLICATIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCHPersonnel Psychology, 1995
- Case and Situation AnalysisSociological Review, 1983
- TIME FOR DYINGThe American Journal of Nursing, 1968