An Examination of Two Non-Cooperative Detect and Avoid Well Clear Definitions
- 8 June 2020
- conference paper
- conference paper
- Published by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) in AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM
Abstract
NASA’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration into the National Airspace System (UAS in the NAS) project examines the technical barriers associated with the operation of UAS in civil airspace. The present study explored the differential effects of two candidate non-cooperative Detect-and-Avoid Well Clear (DWC) definitions on pilot and system performance in a human-in-the-loop simulation. Active-duty UAS pilots were recruited to maintain DWC against representative Class 4 encounter types with a low size, weight, and power (SWaP) radar declaration range of 3.5 nautical miles (nmi). Objective performance indicated that pilots could consistently maintain DWC against non-cooperative intruders with either DWC candidate, with negligible differences in response times and separation performance against caution and warning-level threats. While losses of DWC were avoided at rates comparable to Phase 1 findings, pilots uploaded their responses to caution-level alerts over 5 seconds faster in the current setup relative to Phase 1. Encounters with faster closure rates were susceptible to shortened caution-level alert durations, especially when employing the DWC criterion with the additional ‘Tau’ (temporal) component. Consequently, caution-level threats frequently elevated to warning-level status (nearly twice as often with the Tau candidate). The variable caution alert durations appeared to impact pilots’ coordination with air traffic control (ATC), as ATC approval rates were lower with the ‘Tau’ and ‘Disc’ candidates relative to Phase 1 research. Ultimately, the increased alerting time enabled by the Disc candidate deemed it more suitable for any reductions to the assumed radar declaration range requirement, which was re-evaluated in a follow-on study. Findings from this study will inform Phase 2 Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) development for UAS with alternative surveillance equipment and performance capabilities.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Utility of Visual and Auditory Warning Alerting for Traffic Avoidance during UAS OperationsProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2018
- Validation of Minimum Display Requirements for a UAS Detect and Avoid SystemPublished by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) ,2017
- The Impact of Suggestive Maneuver Guidance on UAS Pilot Performing the Detect and Avoid FunctionPublished by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) ,2016
- A survey of autonomous vision-based See and Avoid for Unmanned Aircraft SystemsProgress in Aerospace Sciences, 2016
- In-flight performance analysis of a non-cooperative radar-based sense and avoid systemProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2015
- An Evaluation of Detect and Avoid (DAA) Displays for Unmanned Aircraft Systems: The Effect of Information Level and Display Location on Pilot PerformancePublished by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) ,2015
- Reducing Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP) of Perception Systems in Small Autonomous Aerial SystemsPublished by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) ,2014
- Avionics sensor fusion for small size unmanned aircraft Sense-and-AvoidPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2014
- Passive multispectral sensor architecture for radar-EOIR sensor fusion for low SWAP UAS sense and avoidPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2014
- Characterization of Sky‐region Morphological‐temporal Airborne Collision DetectionJournal of Field Robotics, 2012