Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Related to COVID-19 Testing: A Rapid Scoping Review
Open Access
- 15 September 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 11 (9), 1685
- https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091685
Abstract
Testing programs for COVID-19 depend on the voluntary actions of members of the public for their success. Understanding people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior related to COVID-19 testing is, therefore, key to the design of effective testing programs worldwide. This paper reports on the findings of a rapid scoping review to map the extent, characteristics, and scope of social science research on COVID-19 testing and identifies key themes from the literature. Main findings include the discoveries that people are largely accepting of testing technologies and guidelines and that a sense of social solidarity is a key motivator of testing uptake. The main barriers to accessing and undertaking testing include uncertainty about eligibility and how to access tests, difficulty interpreting symptoms, logistical issues including transport to and from test sites and the discomfort of sample extraction, and concerns about the consequences of a positive result. The review found that existing research was limited in depth and scope. More research employing longitudinal and qualitative methods based in under-resourced settings and examining intersections between testing and experiences of social, political, and economic vulnerability is needed. Last, the findings of this review suggest that testing should be understood as a social process that is inseparable from processes of contact tracing and isolation and is embedded in people’s everyday routines, livelihoods and relationships.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Research Council (715450)
- Medical Research Council (MR/W006243/1)
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rethinking vulnerability through Covid‐19Anthropology Today, 2020
- Testing for COVID-19: willful ignorance or selfless behavior?Behavioural Public Policy, 2020
- Access to lifesaving medical resources for African countries: COVID-19 testing and response, ethics, and politicsThe Lancet, 2020
- Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic responseNature Human Behaviour, 2020
- The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2020
- Covid-19: testing timesBMJ, 2020
- Covid-19: What is the UK’s testing strategy?Published by BMJ ,2020
- Structural Vulnerability and Health: Latino Migrant Laborers in the United StatesMedical Anthropology, 2011
- A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologiesHealth Information and Libraries Journal, 2009
- Scoping studies: towards a methodological frameworkInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005