Skin in the game? Experimental reactions to prospective reputational damage by corporate personnel
Open Access
- 4 October 2019
- journal article
- Published by Virtus Interpress in Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review
- Vol. 3 (2), 54-63
- https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv3i2p6
Abstract
All organizations confront the possibility of scandal; however, the reputational threat caused by scandal is exacerbated when these events are not properly addressed. Since scandals also have the potential to adversely affect organizational personnel, dilemmas arise regarding traditional ideas of employee agency. In this study, we conduct an experiment manipulating the severity of the reputational threat and its financial consequences for decision-makers, using actual corporate officers and internal auditors. One key question is this: “Are corporate decision-makers’ responses to potential scandals affected by whether they, as incentivized individuals (via stock options), have “skin in the game?” Findings indicate that corporate personnel believe corporations should respond aggressively to scandals having potential reputational consequences; however, they prefer not to proactively respond to reputational threats when expected personal gains are likely to be jeopardized. Internal auditors, by contrast, are less sensitive to personal gains. An archival supplementary analysis supports these findings by suggesting that equity compensation was 17.7% higher before a severe reputational event.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- What determines stock option contract design?Journal of Financial Economics, 2011
- Equity Portfolio Diversification*European Finance Review, 2008
- Performance consequences of mandatory increases in executive stock ownershipJournal of Financial Economics, 2002
- The complexity of compensation contractsJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- Performance Pay and Top-Management IncentivesJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- Reputation and Product QualityThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1984
- Agency Problems and Residual ClaimsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- Students As Surrogates in Behavioral Accounting Research: Some EvidenceJournal of Accounting Research, 1980
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1976