The Fine Line Between Informing and Coercing: Community Health Center Clinicians’ Approaches to Counseling Young People About IUDs
- 1 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Guttmacher Institute in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Vol. 52 (4), 245-252
- https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12161
Abstract
CONTEXT While community health centers (CHCs) are meeting increased demand for contraceptives, little is known about contraceptive counseling in these settings. Understanding how clinicians counsel about IUDs in CHCs, including whether they address or disregard young people's preferences and concerns during counseling, could improve contraceptive care. METHODS As part of a training program, 20 clinicians from 11 San Francisco Bay Area CHC sites who counsel young people about contraception were interviewed by telephone in 2015 regarding their IUD counseling approaches. An iterative grounded theory approach was used to analyze interview transcripts and identify salient themes related to clinicians’ contraceptive counseling, IUD removal practices and efforts to address patient concerns regarding side effects. RESULTS Most clinicians offered comprehensive contraceptive counseling and method choice. While several clinicians viewed counseling as an opportunity to empower their patients to make contraceptive decisions without pressure, they also described a tension between guiding young people toward higher‐efficacy methods and respecting patients’ choices. Many clinicians engaged in what could be considered coercive practices by trying to dissuade patients from removals within a year of placement and offering to treat or downplay side effects. CONCLUSIONS Providers try to promote their young patients’ autonomous decision making, but their support for high‐efficacy methods can result in coercive practices. More training is needed to ensure that providers employ patient‐centered counseling approaches, including honoring patient requests for removals.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors Influencing the Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in CaliforniaObstetrics & Gynecology, 2014
- Interest in and experience with IUD self-removalContraception, 2014
- Accessibility of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)Contraception, 2014
- Committee Opinion No. 539Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012
- Postabortion Contraception: Qualitative Interviews On Counseling and Provision of Long‐Acting Reversible Contraceptive MethodsPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2012
- Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible ContraceptionObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race/ethnicity and socioeconomic statusAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010
- Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?Research in Nursing & Health, 2008
- Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine systemObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteriaQualitative Sociology, 1990