Content analysis and reliability of YouTube™ videos on clear aligner
- 5 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scientific Scholar in APOS Trends in Orthodontics
- Vol. 11 (3), 209-217
- https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_46_2021
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the information provided in the videos about the clear aligner on the Youtube video platform, an internet information source. Materials and Methods: A video search was performed on the Youtube video platform using three keywords determined with the Google Trends application. After the videos were ranked based on their view counts, a total of 75 videos were analyzed, 47 being the first for each term. After applying the exclusion criteria (repetitive content, no audio content or title information, irrelevant to the topic, only promotional content, duration over 15 min, and addressing other orthodontic treatments), the remaining 47 videos were evaluated. Regarding the videos, the following parameters were recorded: View count, number of likes, number of dislikes, number of comments, video duration, and days since the uploaded date. A scoring system consisting of seven parameters was used to classify the video content quality as low and high. The video information and quality index were utilized to evaluate the quality of the videos universally. Statistical analyses were performed with Stata/IC computer program using Shapiro-Wilks, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and linear regression (Backward method) tests. Statistical significance value was set at P < 0.05. Results: Evaluation of the videos based on their upload source revealed that 27 videos were downloaded from individuals, ten videos from doctors and ten videos from commercial sources, and the number of subscribers to these sources varied significantly (P < 0.05). Evaluation of the videos based on the information provided, revealed that 32 videos had poor quality, ten videos had moderate quality and five videos had good quality information content, and the video durations varied significantly (P < 0.05). It was seen that of the 75 videos viewed, only 10 (13.3%) provided information of moderate-good quality. The number of likes was found to be the parameter that significantly affects the view count (P < 0.05). Conclusion: YouTube videos prove insufficient as a source of information on orthodontic treatment with clear aligner. Health-care professionals should be aware of online platforms to ensure that patients can access accurate information.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic reviewHealth Informatics Journal, 2014
- YouTube as an information source for pediatric adenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgeryInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2014
- Informational value and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened on a video-sharing Web siteAngle Orthodontist, 2011
- Online Social Networking by Patients with Diabetes: A Qualitative Evaluation of Communication with FacebookJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Social perceptions of adults wearing orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional studyEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 2010
- Clear Aligner Apareyleri: Üretim ve UygulamaTurkish Journal of Orthodontics, 2009
- Using the Internet for Health-Related Activities: Findings From a National Probability SampleJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2009
- Patients’ use of the Internet for pain-related medical informationPatient Education and Counseling, 2007
- Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient–health professional relationshipPatient Education and Counseling, 2006
- Invisalign A to ZAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2002