The Problematic of Conceiving Human Rights as Legal Demand-Rights
Open Access
- 23 June 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Universidad de Jaen in The Age of Human Rights Journal
- No. 18,p. 377-395
- https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v18.6735
Abstract
Margaret Gilbert’s approach to human rights asserts that these are demand-rights that may be moral or legal. As legal rights, human rights result exclusively from an international practice in which States hold a leading position. This paper offers a critique of Gilbert’s prominent approach to conceptualising human rights as legal demand-rights. I hold here that her state-centric approach does not correctly represent the international practice of human rights and may reinforce the dominant role of States vis-à-vis the individual, which contradicts our contemporary understanding of human rights. If Gilbert’s approach is followed in the way she has proposed, the realisation of these rights could be even more difficult. Such outcome can be avoided by accepting the dual (legal and moral) nature of human rights.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The practice and its authority: an elaborationCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2020
- Human rights practicesCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2020
- Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens) and Other Topics: The Seventy-First Session of the International Law CommissionAmerican Journal of International Law, 2020
- Different Conceptions and a General Concept of Human RightsFudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 2015
- Human Rights and the Social Recognition ThesisJournal of Social Philosophy, 2013
- THE CONCEPT OF HUMAN DIGNITY AND THE REALISTIC UTOPIA OF HUMAN RIGHTSMetaphilosophy, 2010
- The Struggle for Human Rights in AfricaCanadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines, 2007