Estimating the minimal clinically important difference for balance and gait outcome measures in individuals with vestibular disorders
- 2 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOS Press in Journal of Vestibular Research
- Vol. 32 (3), 223-233
- https://doi.org/10.3233/ves-201630
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapists (VRT) utilize outcome measures to quantify gait and balance abilities in individuals with vestibular disorders (IVD). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in gait and balance outcome measThis publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Responsiveness and Minimal Detectable Change of the Dynamic Gait Index and Functional Gait Index in Persons With Balance and Vestibular DisordersJournal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 2014
- Assessing the Walking Speed of Older AdultsAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2013
- Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic reviewJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2008
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methodsThe Spine Journal, 2007
- Meaningful Change and Responsiveness in Common Physical Performance Measures in Older AdultsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2006
- Discriminative and Evaluative Properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) ScaleThe Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 1998
- The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) ScaleThe Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 1995
- The Development of the Dizziness Handicap InventoryJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1990
- Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important differenceControlled Clinical Trials, 1989