Becoming a clinician: Trainee identity formation within the general practice supervisory relationship
- 29 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 54 (11), 993-1005
- https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14203
Abstract
Objectives Becoming a clinician is a trajectory of identity formation in the context of supervised practice. This is a social process where the supervisory relationship is key. Therefore, to know how to support identity formation of clinical trainees, it is necessary to understand how this happens within the supervisory relationship. Our aim was to develop a conceptualisation of trainee identity formation within the general practice(GP) supervisory relationship to aid its support. Methods We took a critical realist approach using case study design and ‘cultural worlds’ theory as a conceptual frame. Each case comprised a GP trainee/supervisor pair. Our data were weekly audio‐recordings of interactions between trainee, supervisor and a patient over 12‐weeks augmented by post‐interaction reflections and sequential interviews. We undertook interpretive analysis using dialogic methods focusing on the doing of language and the cultural Discourses expressed. Results We identified three social Discourses centring on: clinical responsibility; ownership of clinical knowledge; and, measures of trainee competency. Versions of these Discourses defined four trainee/supervisor relational arrangements within which trainee and supervisor assumed reciprocal identities. We labelled these: junior learner/expert clinician; apprentice assistant/master coach; co‐clinicians; and, lead clinician/advisor. We found a trajectory across these identity arrangements. Behind this trajectory was an invitation by the supervisor to the trainee into the social space of clinician and a readiness of the trainee to accept this invitation. Congruence in supervisor and trainee positioning was important. Conclusions In the supervisory relationship, trainee and supervisor adopted reciprocal identities. For trainees to progress to identity of lead clinician, supervisors needed to invite their trainee into this space and vacate it themselves. Congruence between supervisor positioning of their trainee and trainee authorship of themselves was important and was aided by explicit dialogue and common purpose. We offer a model and language for trainees, supervisors and faculty to facilitate this.Keywords
Funding Information
- Department of Health, Australian Government
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Entrustment Decision Making in Clinical TrainingAcademic Medicine, 2016
- Reframing Medical Education to Support Professional Identity FormationAcademic Medicine, 2014
- Science of the ParticularQualitative Health Research, 2014
- Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplaceAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2013
- General practitioners as supervisors in postgraduate clinical education: an integrative reviewMedical Education, 2012
- Participation and progression: new medical graduates entering professional practiceAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2011
- Preserving professional credibility: grounded theory study of medical trainees' requests for clinical supportBMJ, 2009
- Figured Worlds and Education: An Introduction to the Special IssueThe Urban Review, 2007
- Relational Interdependence Between Social and Individual Agency in Work and Working LifeMind, Culture, and Activity, 2006
- Informal learning in the workplaceStudies in Continuing Education, 2004