A comparison between two different immobilization devices for radiation therapy treatment of pelvic cancer using VMAT
- 17 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
- Vol. 52 (2), 238-247
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2021.02.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of interfraction setup error, patient comfort, and therapist acceptance for 2 different prostate radiation therapy immobilization devicesAdvances in Radiation Oncology, 2017
- Dosimetric comparisons of VMAT, IMRT and 3DCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer with simultaneous integrated boostOncotarget, 2015
- A comparison of two systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapyRadiation Oncology, 2014
- A comparison between four immobilization systems for pelvic radiation therapy using CBCT and paired kilovoltage portals based image-guided radiotherapyJournal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 2014
- A Treatment Planning Investigation Into the Dosimetric Effects of Systematic Prostate Patient Rotational Set-Up ErrorsMedical Dosimetry, 2008
- Image-guided patient positioning: If one cannot correct for rotational offsets in external-beam radiotherapy setup, how should rotational offsets be managed?Medical Physics, 2007
- Errors and margins in radiotherapySeminars in Radiation Oncology, 2004
- The use of a leg holder immobilisation device in 3D-conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancerRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2002
- A prospective comparison of three systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapyEndocrine, 2000
- Set-up error in supine-positioned patients immobilized with two different modalities during conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancerRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1998