On the past, present, and future of in vivo science
- 24 September 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Lab Animal
- Vol. 50 (10), 273-276
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-021-00848-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multi-batch design to deliver robust estimates of efficacy and reduce animal use – a syngeneic tumour case studyScientific Reports, 2020
- Reproducibility of preclinical animal research improves with heterogeneity of study samplesPLoS Biology, 2018
- Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studiesNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2018
- Introducing Therioepistemology: the study of how knowledge is gained from animal researchLab Animal, 2017
- Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for ImprovementPLoS Biology, 2015
- The Significance of Meaning: Why Do Over 90% of Behavioral Neuroscience Results Fail to Translate to Humans, and What Can We Do to Fix It?ILAR Journal, 2014
- Scientific method: Statistical errorsNature, 2014
- Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal ResearchPLoS Biology, 2010
- Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies?PLoS Medicine, 2010
- Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using AnimalsPLOS ONE, 2009