Panel Bias During Sexual Assault Courts-Martial
- 1 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 48 (3), 350-357
- https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003939-20
Abstract
This article examines criticism from the scholarly community and findings from the military's Judicial Proceedings Panel that training in the U.S. Department of Defense Sexual Assault Prevention and Response program biases panel members during courts-martial. The topic is examined from the perspective of psychological science. Studies on jury bias, stereotypes, decision-making dynamics, and behavioral conditioning are applied to the question of whether sexual assault prevention training can bias panel members. Analysis of the subject suggests that servicemembers are subjected to a range of bias-inducing mechanisms that arise within the military context. This article concludes that expert witnesses in behavioral science should be called during courts-martial to explain how judgements may be influenced by institutional training. Reinforcing the integrity of the military justice system has implications for protecting individual liberties.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors’ guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.Law and Human Behavior, 2017
- Social Influence: Compliance and ConformityAnnual Review of Psychology, 2004
- Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2001