The Levels of Students’ Feeling of Rightness (FOR) in Solving Polygon Perimeter Problems
- 1 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Modestum Ltd in International Journal of Instruction
- Vol. 13 (2), 549-566
- https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13238a
Abstract
This research aimed to describe the levels of feeling of rightness (FOR) of students. This research used a qualitative method with an explorative type. The subjects of this research were 3 students of 5th grade selected from 77 other students in Indonesia. In uncovering FOR subject of this research, instruments were used in the form of problems about the open-ended polygon perimeter and interview guidelines. The data of this research were the subjects' answers to the problems of polygon perimeter and the results of interviews with subjects related to these answers. The data were analyzed using the FOR subject level indicator rubric. There were three levels of FOR which were the findings in this research, namely low, medium, and high. Low FOR level was indicated by the answers crossed out and the objectives or goal changed. Medium FOR level was indicated by crossed out answers, objectives or goals changed, problems text read repeatedly, indecisive statements about the truth of the answers that have been generated, and doubts in determining the steps to be taken. High FOR level was indicated by answers that were not crossed and goals that were not changed.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Matching bias on the selection task: It's fast and feels goodThinking & Reasoning, 2013
- Refining the dual‐system theory of choiceJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2013
- Bias and ConflictPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2012
- Intuition, reason, and metacognitionCognitive Psychology, 2011
- Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applicationsDevelopmental Review, 2011
- Students’ Difficulties in Mathematics Problem-Solving: What do they Say?Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010
- The distinction between intuition and guessing in the SRT task generation: A reply to Norman and PriceConsciousness and Cognition, 2010
- Intuitive vs analytical thinking: four perspectivesEducational Studies in Mathematics, 2009
- Between perception and intuition: Learning about infinityThe Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 2008
- Effects of Task Relevance and Stimulus-Driven Salience in Feature-Search Mode.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2004