Agricultural insurance access and acceptability: examining the case of smallholder farmers in Ghana
Open Access
- 28 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Agriculture & Food Security
- Vol. 10 (1), 1-14
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00292-y
Abstract
Background: Weather-related risks thwart agricultural productivity gains especially in the face of climate change. Agricultural insurance serves as a reliable risk mitigation instrument for coping with climate-related hazards. This notwithstanding, agricultural insurance penetration among smallholder farmers in the global south remains low. This study investigated the access and acceptability of agricultural insurance among smallholder food crop farmers in Ghana. Method: The study employed a mixed-methods approach involving both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The study was carried out in the Northern, Volta and Western regions involving 7 communities in 5 districts. A total of 200 farmers were sampled through a multi-stage purposive sampling and interviewed. A cross-sectional survey involved 100 respondents under the quantitative approach whilst the qualitative study engaged additional 100 farmers. Results: The results show that smallholder farmers’ access and acceptability of agricultural insurance is low (14%) and scarce but ironically considered useful by many (90%) as an effective tool to deal with agricultural risks. Inadequate knowledge about agricultural insurance products constituted the most stated reason (64%) for the scarce adoption rate, followed (23%) by the unavailability of insurance products in areas needed but absent. A few (5%) reported insurance to be expensive. Acceptability and accessibility of agricultural insurance are further influenced by gender, educational level, low knowledge, information asymmetry and wrong perception concerning agricultural insurance products. Sense of security and reduced impact of climate variabilities constituted important benefits guaranteed by agricultural insurance. Conclusions: Agricultural insurance access and acceptability is constrained by limited knowledge of agricultural insurance products. It is recommended that more insurance companies be incentivized to augment already existing efforts by Ghana Agricultural Insurance Pool (GAIP) to enroll more smallholder farmers. The government can consider bundling existing insurance products with credit or inputs under the Planting for Food and Jobs Programme (PFJ) to improve uptake and accessibility of agricultural insurance.Funding Information
- The Business Sector Advocacy Challenge (BUSAC) Funds (Grant ID 32-2-018)
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Content AnalysisPublished by Wiley ,2016
- FARMERS WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR CROP INSURANCE IN PAKISTANPressacademia, 2015
- Climate variability, food security and poverty: Agent-based assessment of policy options for farm households in Northern GhanaEnvironmental Science & Policy, 2015
- Managing Risk with Insurance and Savings: Experimental Evidence for Male and Female Farm Managers in West AfricaSSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
- Multiple-peril crop insurance: successes and challengesAgricultural Finance Review, 2014
- Protecting financial investment: agriculture insurance in GhanaAgricultural Finance Review, 2014
- Rural Women’s Access to Financial Services: Credit, Savings, and InsurancePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2014
- The demand for insurance against common shocksJournal of Development Economics, 2014
- Barriers to Household Risk Management: Evidence from IndiaAmerican Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2013
- Agricultural Insurance in Developed Countries: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 2012