A comparative carbon footprint analysis of disposable and reusable vaginal specula
- 14 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 223 (2), 225.e1-225.e7
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Environmental Impacts of Abdominal Imaging: A Pilot InvestigationJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2018
- Environmental considerations in the selection of isolation gowns: A life cycle assessment of reusable and disposable alternativesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2018
- Environmental Impacts of the U.S. Health Care System and Effects on Public HealthPLOS ONE, 2016
- Environmental Impacts of Surgical Procedures: Life Cycle Assessment of Hysterectomy in the United StatesEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2015
- Occupational hazards associated with endoscope high-level disinfection: Case vignettes, review of literature and recommendations for mitigationWork, 2014
- Life cycle assessment perspectives on delivering an infant in the USScience of The Total Environment, 2012
- Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Laryngeal Mask AirwaysAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2012
- Ortho-Phthalaldehyde Exposure Levels among Endoscope Disinfection WorkersSangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health, 2010
- Estimate of the Carbon Footprint of the US Health Care SectorJAMA, 2009
- THE USE OF LCA TO INTRODUCE LIFE-CYCLE THINKING INTO DECISION-MAKING FOR THE PURCHASE OF MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE NHSJournal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2000