Fear of coronavirus and forbid/allow asymmetry as determinants of acceptance of COVID-19 pandemic related restrictions and persistence of attitudes towards these regulations
Open Access
- 23 December 2020
- journal article
- Published by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) in Social Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 15 (4), 1-13
- https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.4421
Abstract
In this study (N = 110) factors influencing formation of attitudes toward COVID-19 related restrictions as well as factors influencing stability or change of these attitudes were tested. Specifically, the study concentrated on two possible determinants of formation and changing attitudes toward COVID-19 related restrictions – fear of coronavirus and presenting restriction in forbid vs. allow frames. A restriction presented in the forbid frame was rejected more strongly than a restriction presented in the allow frame. For changing attitudes, a mere thought paradigm was used. This activity was not able to change these negative attitudes toward a forbid framed restriction. A higher level of fear of coronavirus was related to a more positive (or rather – less negative) attitude toward an allow framed restriction and allows this attitude to be changed to be more supportive of restrictions than initially. Moreover, the effect of fear was partially mediated by the changes in the confidence of initial attitude inconsistent thoughts.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fear, explanation and action – the psychosocial response to emerging infectionsJournal of Infection Prevention, 2020
- Response to restrictive policies: Reconciling system justification and psychological reactanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2013
- Motivated Reflection on Attitude-Inconsistent InformationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2013
- A self-validation perspective on the mere thought effectJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010
- Fear and Loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, Emotion, and PersuasionJournal of Marketing Research, 2009
- G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciencesBehavior Research Methods, 2007
- The Meanings of ‘Yes’ and ‘No’. An Explanation for the Forbid/Allow AsymmetryQuality & Quantity, 2006
- Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to EmotionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2005
- Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- Not Forbidding Isn't Allowing: The Cognitive Basis of the Forbid-Allow AsymmetryPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1986