Effect of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing on HIV testing and antiretroviral therapy initiation in Malawi: A cluster-randomised trial
Open Access
- 11 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 18 (5), e1003608
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003608
Abstract
Undiagnosed HIV infection remains substantial in key population subgroups including adolescents, older adults, and men, driving ongoing transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the impact, safety, and costs of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing (HIVST), aiming to increase HIV testing in underserved subgroups and stimulate demand for antiretroviral therapy (ART). This cluster-randomised trial, conducted between October 2018 and July 2019, used restricted randomisation (1:1) to allocate 30 group village head clusters in Mangochi district, Malawi to the community-led HIVST intervention in addition to the standard of care (SOC) or the SOC alone. The intervention involved mobilising community health groups to lead the design and implementation of 7-day HIVST campaigns, with cluster residents (≥15 years) eligible for HIVST. The primary outcome compared lifetime HIV testing among adolescents (15 to 19 years) between arms. Secondary outcomes compared: recent HIV testing (in the last 3 months) among older adults (≥40 years) and men; cumulative 6-month incidence of ART initiation per 100,000 population; knowledge of the preventive benefits of HIV treatment; and HIV testing stigma. Outcomes were measured through a post-intervention survey and at neighboring health facilities. Analysis used intention-to-treat for cluster-level outcomes. Community health groups delivered 24,316 oral fluid-based HIVST kits. The survey included 90.2% (3,960/4,388) of listed participants in the 15 community-led HIVST clusters and 89.2% (3,920/4,394) of listed participants in the 15 SOC clusters. Overall, the proportion of men was 39.0% (3,072/7,880). Most participants obtained primary-level education or below, were married, and reported a sexual partner. Lifetime HIV testing among adolescents was higher in the community-led HIVST arm (84.6%, 770/910) than the SOC arm (67.1%, 582/867; adjusted risk difference [RD] 15.2%, 95% CI 7.5% to 22.9%; p < 0.001), especially among 15 to 17 year olds and boys. Recent testing among older adults was also higher in the community-led HIVST arm (74.5%, 869/1,166) than the SOC arm (31.5%, 350/1,111; adjusted RD 42.1%, 95% CI 34.9% to 49.4%; p < 0.001). Similarly, the proportions of recently tested men were 74.6% (1,177/1,577) and 33.9% (507/1,495) in the community-led HIVST and SOC arms, respectively (adjusted RD 40.2%, 95% CI 32.9% to 47.4%; p < 0.001). Knowledge of HIV treatment benefits and HIV testing stigma showed no differences between arms. Cumulative incidence of ART initiation was respectively 305.3 and 226.1 per 100,000 population in the community-led HIVST and SOC arms (RD 72.3, 95% CI −36.2 to 180.8; p = 0.18). In post hoc analysis, ART initiations in the 3-month post-intervention period were higher in the community-led HIVST arm than the SOC arm (RD 97.7, 95% CI 33.4 to 162.1; p = 0.004). HIVST uptake was 74.7% (2,956/3,960), with few adverse events (0.6%, 18/2,955) and at US$5.70 per HIVST kit distributed. The main limitations include the use of self-reported HIV testing outcomes and lack of baseline measurement for the primary outcome. In this study, we found that community-led HIVST was effective, safe, and affordable, with population impact and coverage rapidly realised at low cost. This approach could enable community HIV testing in high HIV prevalence settings and demonstrates potential for economies of scale and scope. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03541382.Funding Information
- UNITAID (PO#8477-0-600)
- Wellcome Trust (WT091769)
- UNITAID (PO#8477-0-600)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- What do the Universal Test and Treat trials tell us about the path to HIV epidemic control?Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020
- Development assistance for community health workers in 114 low- and middle-income countries, 2007–2017Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2019
- HIV-1 Epidemic Control — Insights from Test-and-Treat TrialsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2019
- Cost‐per‐diagnosis as a metric for monitoring cost‐effectiveness of HIV testing programmes in low‐income settings in southern Africa: health economic and modelling analysisJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2019
- Barriers to, and emerging strategies for, HIV testing among adolescents in sub-Saharan AfricaCurrent Opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2018
- Community-based strategies to strengthen men’s engagement in the HIV care cascade in sub-Saharan AfricaPLoS Medicine, 2017
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of community and facility-based HIV testing to address linkage to care gaps in sub-Saharan AfricaNature, 2015
- Evidence based community mobilization for dengue prevention in Nicaragua and Mexico (Camino Verde,the Green Way): cluster randomized controlled trialBMJ, 2015
- Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes: a review of the literatureHealth Policy and Planning, 2014
- Effect of community-based voluntary counselling and testing on HIV incidence and social and behavioural outcomes (NIMH Project Accept; HPTN 043): a cluster-randomised trialThe Lancet. Global Health, 2014