Cross-cultural comparison of plant use knowledge in Baitadi and Darchula districts, Nepal Himalaya
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 11 June 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
- Vol. 14 (1), 1-17
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0242-7
Abstract
This study seeks to better understand the human-nature interface and to measure the variability of plant use knowledge among cultures, through inter- and intracultural analyses. We compared plant collection, use, and management of two culturally distinct groups (Baitadi and Darchula) of the Nepal Himalaya. They inhabit different physiographic regions, yet share the same ecological landscape, environmental resources, and livelihood challenges. We hypothesized that the elderly, native, and traditional healers living in remote and rural places possess more diverse and detailed knowledge of plant use and conservation than young, non-native, and non-healers. A total of 106 people were contacted for interviews, and 100 (68 men and 32 women) agreed to share ethnobotanical, demographic, and socioeconomic information. They were asked about the three most important plants for their socioeconomic benefit, culture, primary health care, and livelihood. The knowledge of plant collection, use, and its transfer was strongly associated with the cultural heritage whereas the ecogeographical condition influences the ways in which plants are collected and used. The divergent knowledge of plant collection, use, and transfer between the participants of Baitadi and Darchula was significantly (p < 0.001) attributed to the cultural heritage of the area. The low consensus of plant use (FiC 0–0.87; IASc 0–0.67) between Baitadi and Darchula district could be due to cultural divergence, varied accessibility, physiographic heterogeneity, and biodiversity uniqueness. Differences in plant use knowledge may help in diversifying the strategies of plant use in accordance with the livelihood, culture, and environment, and therefore, more studies measuring these aspects can further the ecosystem and cultural health of the region.Keywords
Funding Information
- Rufford Foundation (21198-2)
- FAU dissertation support (2018)
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medicinal plants, traditional medicine, markets and management in far-west NepalJournal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2013
- Diversity of Medicinal Plants among Different Forest-use Types of the Pakistani HimalayaEconomic Botany, 2012
- Local knowledge and socio-economic determinants of traditional medicines' utilization in livestock health management in Southwest NigeriaJournal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2012
- Ethnobotanical knowledge in rural communities of Cordoba (Argentina): the importance of cultural and biogeographical factorsJournal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2009
- The relation between accessibility, diversity and indigenous valuation of vegetation in the Bolivian AndesJournal of Arid Environments, 2009
- Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by people in Zegie Peninsula, Northwestern EthiopiaJournal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2007
- Influence of diversity and road access on palm extraction at landscape scale in SE EcuadorBiodiversity and Conservation, 2007
- LINGUISTIC, CULTURAL, AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITYAnnual Review of Anthropology, 2005
- Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, IndiaForest Ecology and Management, 1998
- Traditional Medicine in American Families:Marriage & Family Review, 1988