Determinan Risiko Likuiditas Bank Syariah dan Konvensional Sebelum dan Selama Pandemi Covid-19

Abstract

ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini dilakukan adalah untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis determinan risiko likuiditas pada bank syariah dan konvensional yang beroperasi di Indonesia sebelum dan selama pandemi COVID-19. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan data panel untuk mengkaji hubungan antara risiko likuiditas dengan faktor spesifik bank dan faktor makroekonomi sebelum dan selama pandemi COVID-19 (2018-2021). Dengan mengambil sampel dari 10 bank syariah dan 20 bank konvensional yang ada di Indonesia, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa faktor spesifik bank yaitu Capital Adequacy ratio (CAR), Return on Equity (ROE), dan Non Performing Loan (NPL) atau risiko kredit memiliki pengaruh pada likuiditas bank syariah. Sementara CAR dan NPL tidak memberikan pengaruh pada likuiditas bank konvensional hanya ROE yang memiliki pengaruh pada risiko likuiditas bank konvensional. Adapun faktor makro ekonomi (pertumbuhan GDP dan inflasi) tidak mempengaruhi risiko likuiditas kedua bank. Kemudian variabel pandemic tidak memberikan pengaruh pada risiko likuiditas kedua jenis bank. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat mempermudah para bankir dalam mengambil keputusan untuk meningkatkan kualitas pengelolaan likuiditas pada kedua sistem perbankan tersebut, terutama dimasa pandemi covid-19, agar tidak terjadi kebangkrutan. Kata Kunci: Risiko Likuiditas, Bank Syariah, Bank Konvensional, Covid-19.   ABSTRACT This study aims to identify and analyze the determinants of liquidity risk in Islamic and conventional banking in Indonesia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study uses a panel data approach to examine the relationship between liquidity risk with bank-specific and macroeconomic factors before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2018-2021). By taking samples from 10 Islamic banks and 20 conventional banks operating in Indonesia, this study found that bank-specific factors consist of Capital Adequacy ratio (CAR), Return on Equity (ROE), and Non-Performing loans (NPL) or credit risk affect the liquidity of Syariah banking. While CAR and NPL have no significant effect on conventional bank liquidity, other bank-specific factors, namely ROE, have a considerable effect on the liquidity risk of conventional banking. Meanwhile, macroeconomic factors (GDP growth and inflation) did not affect the liquidity risk of the two banks. Meanwhile, the dummy variable shows no significant effect on liquidity risk in Islamic and conventional banks related to pandemic conditions. Thus, this research is expected to facilitate bankers in making decisions to improve the quality of liquidity management in the two banking systems. Keywords: Liquidity Risk, Islamic Banks, Conventional Banks, Covid-19. DAFTAR PUSTAKA Abdel Megeid, N. S. (2017). Liquidity risk management: conventional versus Islamic banking system in Egypt. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(1), 100–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2014-0018 Abdul-Rahman, A., Sulaiman, A. A., & Said, N. L. H. M. (2018). Does financing structure affects bank liquidity risk? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 52(9), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.04.004 Adawiyah, N. N., & Azifah, N. (2020). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi likuiditas pada bank umum syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 25(3), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.35760/eb.2020.v25i3.2663 Almira, N. P. A. K., & Wiagustini, N. L. P. (2020). Return on asset, return on equity, dan earning per share berpengaruh terhadap return saham. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 9(3), 1069. https://doi.org/10.24843/ejmunud.2020.v09.i03.p13 Arif, A., & Nauman Anees, A. (2012). Liquidity risk and performance of banking system. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 20(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/13581981211218342 Berger, A.N. and Bouwman, C. H. (2009). Bank liquidity creation. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779–3837. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn104 BPS. (n.d.). Pengertian pendapatan nasional. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/subject/11/produk-domestik-bruto--lapangan-usaha-.html Cahyono, E. F., Rani, L. N., & Mardianto, M. F. F. (2021). Determinants of Indonesian conventional and Islamic bank depositor trust during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 7(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v7i1.1352 CNBC Indonesia. (2020). LPS: Perbankan hadapi risiko likuiditas ketat & NPL meningkat. Retrieved from https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20200623142740-4-167394/lps-perbankan-hadapi-risiko-likuiditas-ketat-npl-meningkat Dendawijaya, L. (2003). Manajemen perbankan. Bogor: Ghalia Indah. Dinger, V. (2009). Do foreign-owned banks affect banking system liquidity risk? Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(4), 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2009.04.003 Fauziana, L., Mulyaningsih, A., Anggraeni, E., M, S. C. Y., & Rofida, U. (2014). Keterkaitan investasi modal terhadap GDP Indonesia. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 3(2), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v3i2.3845 Gautam, R. (2016). The Determinants of banks liquidity: Empirical evidence on Nepalese commercial banks. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 69–78. Ghenimi, A., Chaibi, H., & Omri, M. A. B. (2021a). Liquidity risk determinants: Islamic vs conventional banks. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2018-0060 Hanifah, R. U., Ariefiantoro, T., & Suryawardana, E. (2021). Analisis pengaruh non-performing loan (npl), return on asset (roa), return on equity (roe)...