Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes
- 1 September 2017
- journal article
- Published by SLACK, Inc. in Journal of Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 33 (9), 632-638
- https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20170621-09
Abstract
The current study showed the feasibility of use of non-tomographical parameters obtained from the Corvis ST for differentiating normal eyes and those with forme fruste keratoconus and keratoconus. The diagnostic ability of the Corvis ST was comparable to that of the Pentacam for differentiating normal eyes and eyes with forme fruste keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(9):632-638.].This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Keratoconus Clinical Findings According to Different ClassificationsCornea, 2015
- Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic EyesOptometry and Vision Science, 2015
- Early diagnosis of keratoconus: what difference is it making?British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014
- Corneal Topographic and Tomographic Analysis of Fellow Eyes in Unilateral Keratoconus Patients Using PentacamAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014
- Improved Keratoconus Detection by Ocular Response Analyzer Testing After Consideration of Corneal Thickness as a Confounding FactorJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2012
- Novel Pachymetric Parameters Based on Corneal Tomography for Diagnosing KeratoconusJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2011
- Management of keratoconus: current scenarioBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010
- Chasing the suspect: keratoconusBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009
- Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patientsOphthalmology, 2004
- Unilateral KeratoconusOphthalmology, 1997