Coauthorship Trends in the Field of Management: Facts and Perceptions
- 1 December 2017
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Learning & Education
- Vol. 16 (4), 509-530
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2016.0080
Abstract
This paper explores the perceptions, preferences, and motivations that contribute to a widely recognized phenomenon: the continuous rise of co-authorship within the field of management. Using data from Web of Science, we first confirm that the average number of authors on published papers has steadily and continuously increased over the last four decades, and compare this trend across subfields and journals. We also conducted a survey, asking management researchers about their perceptions of co-authorship trends and their reactions to specific authorship scenarios. Comparing the "facts" and the "perceptions" of co-authorship, we suggest that increasing co-authorship in management reflects not only quality considerations and the need for collaborations but also instrumental motivations. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for the processes of peer evaluation and education in management.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Iron Cage and the Monkey's Paw: Isomorphism, Legitimacy, and the Perils of a Rising JournalAcademy of Management Learning & Education, 2013
- The Roots, Rituals, and Rhetorics of ChangePublished by Stanford University Press ,2011
- Free-Riding on Power Laws: questioning the validity of the Impact Factor as a measure of research quality in organization studiesOrganization, 2011
- When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic RankingsAcademy of Management Learning & Education, 2009
- Co‐Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis*Journal of Management Studies, 2006
- Notes on the Evolution of a Research Community: Organization Studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000Organization Science, 2005
- Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines: A comparative trend analysis of scholarship in the social, physical, and mathematical sciencesThe American Sociologist, 1999
- A probabilistic model for the distribution of authorshipsJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991
- The Rising Incidence of Co-authorship in Economics: Further EvidenceThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1988
- The group fallacy in relation to social science.The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 1924