Butas a stance marker in Nigerian investigative public hearings
- 13 October 2017
- journal article
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Vol. 8 (3), 400-420
- https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.3.04unu
Abstract
This study examines the kinds of stance that but as a contrastive marker signals in Nigerian investigative public hearings, with a view to exploring the contexts in which the stances are made. The study examines forty purposively selected investigative public hearing sessions which involve interactions between complainants, defendants and a hearing panel. The data are analysed qualitatively utilising Du Bois’ (2007) interactional view of stance and Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal system. Results indicate that but signals epistemic, evidential, emotive and evaluative stances within the narrative, interrogative and closing contexts. These stances and their contextual patterns depend heavily on the roles, goals and knowledge of the participants as stancetakers who position themselves, and align with other participants and the wider discourse community in order to express evaluation and intersubjective positioning.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dealing with a traumatic past: the victim hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their reconciliation discourseCritical Discourse Studies, 2009
- Revealing stance through passive voiceJournal of Pragmatics, 2009
- The audience as actor: the participation status of the audience at the victim hearings of the South African TRCDiscourse Studies, 2009
- Reformulation and Conflict in the Witness Examination: The Case of Public InquiriesInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 2009
- “I Think, Therefore . . .”Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2008
- 'Language has a Heart': Linguistic Markers of Evaluation in Selected TRC TestimoniesJournal of Multicultural Discourses, 2008
- Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical StanceRELC Journal, 2006
- Stance in spoken and written university registersJournal of English for Academic Purposes, 2006
- Critical discourse analysis as an analytic tool in considering selected, prominent features of TRC testimoniesJournal of Language and Politics, 2006
- Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourseDiscourse Studies, 2005