Readability of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures for Head and Neck Oncology
- 20 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 130 (12), 2839-2842
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28555
Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are communication tools to help patients convey their disease experience to medical providers and guide management decisions. However, the utility of healthcare outcome measures is dependent on patient literacy and readability of PROMs. If written for a more advanced literacy level, they can misestimate symptoms and add significant barriers to care, especially in the underserved. However, readability of head and neck (H&N) oncology PROMs has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the readability of H&N oncology PROMs to assess whether they meet recommended readability levels. Study Design Bibliometric review. Methods Three readability measures: Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and FORCAST were used to evaluate the readability level of commonly used H&N PROMs. PROMs with sixth grade readability level or lower were considered to meet the recommendations of health literacy experts. Results Eight H&N oncology PROMs were reviewed. None of H&N PROMs met health literacy experts' and National Institutes of Health recommended reading levels. Gunning Fog consistently estimated easiest readability and FORCAST the most difficult. Conclusions PROMs are important clinical tools that drive patient‐centric care in H&N oncology. All H&N PROMs are written above recommended reading levels and do not meet suggested standards. Future PROMs should be written with easier readability to accurately convey patients' H&N oncology disease experiences. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 2020Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic settingBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Readability of Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaires for Use with Persons with Swallowing DisordersDysphagia, 2011
- The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparitiesCancer, 2011
- The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps: the role of generic and specific questionnaires on assessing its impact on patient’s quality of lifeAllergy, 2008
- Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Medical Care, 2007
- Assessment of patient‐reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health‐related quality of lifeFundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 2004
- Lay understanding of terms used in cancer consultationsPsycho‐Oncology, 2003
- Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practiceApplied Nursing Research, 1996
- Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patientsHead & Neck, 1993