Cessation of Pulsed Lavage During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: The Effect on Hip Hemiarthroplasty Cement Mantles
Open Access
- 1 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Cureus
- Vol. 13 (8)
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16809
Abstract
With the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, we were issued with guidance to minimize aerosol-generating procedures and discontinued the use of pulsed lavage for hip hemiarthroplasty. Instead, we used a bladder syringe to wash the femoral canal. The aim of this study was to assess whether this change in practice had a detrimental effect on the quality of the bone cement mantles in patients undergoing cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated at a tertiary teaching hospital in the United Kingdom (Addenbrookes, Cambridge University Hospitals) presenting with a neck of femur fracture requiring a hemiarthroplasty between October 2019 and June 2020. We retrospectively assessed 100 post-operative radiographs for patients who had received hip hemiarthroplasty following neck of femur fragility fracture (50 before the service change and 50 after). The Barrack classification was used to assess the quality of the bone cement mantle. Pre-SARS-CoV-2, 30% of hemiarthroplasties were deemed as being “at risk” of aseptic loosening. During SARS-CoV-2, 64% of hips were deemed as being “at risk.” This represents a statistically significant absolute increase of 34% (P < 0.05, the P value is 0.000645). Both clinicians agreed on the classification of hips “at risk” or “not at risk” (i.e., grades C/D and A/B, respectively) in 85% of the cases. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was calculated as 0.68, indicating substantial agreement. Following our experience of this forced service change, we would discourage abandoning the use of pulsed lavage in future pandemics. We have demonstrated an association between abandoning pulsed lavage and detrimental effects on the procedural quality for hip hemiarthroplasty. Patients treated over this time period will be closely monitored for operative complications. As this was the only equipment change made for this procedure, we have demonstrated its detrimental effect on the procedural quality. Should pulsed lavage be discontinued, patients may need to be counseled for higher risk of early failure and revision surgery and may require long-term radiographic follow-up. In SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, Surgeons should carefully consider the risks and benefits of using pulsed lavage in accordance with the personal protective equipment they have available and the consequential impact on the bone cement mantle quality.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- When does hip fracture surgery fail?Injury, 2014
- Bone cementJournal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2013
- Mitigating surgical risk in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for fractures of the proximal femurThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2009
- Does pulse lavage reduce hip hemiarthroplasty infection rates?Journal of Hospital Infection, 2006
- Prediction of Charnley femoral stem aseptic loosening by early post-operative radiological featuresInternational Orthopaedics, 2005
- Radiological features predictive of aseptic loosening in cemented Charnley femoral stemsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2001
- Lavage technique in total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2000
- Femoral cement grading in total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1998
- Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of Improved Techniques of Cementing. The Results after a Minimum of Fifteen Years of Follow-up*Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1997
- Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review.1992