Evidence Mapping to Justify Health Interventions
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
- Vol. 64 (2), 155-172
- https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2021.0018
Abstract
In order to support health interventions, biomedical and population health researchers need to collect solid evidence. This article asks what type of evidence this should be and expands on previous work that focused on etiological explanations, or causal-mechanical explanations of why and how illness occurs. The article proposes adding predictive evidence to the explanatory evidence, in order to form a joint evidence set, or JES = [A,B,C,D], which consists of four different types of evidence: association [A], biology [B], confirmation [C], and difference-making [D]. The article discusses explanatory coherence as a backbone for this proposal, suggests criteria for each type of evidence, and offers a rubric for multi-evidence mapping.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causal Inference in Public HealthAnnual Review of Public Health, 2013
- Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseasesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
- Evidence and the Assessment of Causal Relations in the Health SciencesInternational Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2012
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill's ‘guidelines for causation’ contribute?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009
- Interpreting Causality in the Health SciencesInternational Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2007
- Reply to Humphreys and Freedman's Review of Causation, Prediction, and SearchThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1997
- HIV Causes AIDSScience, 1988
- Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World.The Philosophical Review, 1988
- ON PREDICTION AND EXPLANATIONThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1958