Extending the concept of research impact literacy: levels of literacy, institutional role and ethical considerations
Open Access
- 7 June 2019
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Emerald Open Research
Abstract
Building on the concept of ‘impact literacy’ established in a previous paper from Bayley and Phipps, here we extend the principles of impact literacy in light of further insights into sector practice. More specifically, we focus on three additions needed in response to the sector-wide growth of impact: (1) differential levels of impact literacy; (2) institutional impact literacy and environment for impact; and (3) issues of ethics and values in research impact. This paper invites the sector to consider the relevance of all dimensions in establishing, maintaining and strengthening impact within the research landscape. We explore implications for individual professional development, institutional capacity building and ethical collaboration to maximise societal benefit.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Building the concept of research impact literacyEvidence & Policy, 2019
- Development of a framework for knowledge mobilisation and impact competenciesEvidence & Policy, 2018
- The Origins of WEIRD PsychologySSRN Electronic Journal, 2018
- ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessmentHealth Research Policy and Systems, 2018
- Determinants of successful knowledge brokering: A transnational comparison of knowledge-intermediary organizationsResearch for All, 2017
- A critical review of population health literacy assessmentBMC Public Health, 2015
- Reflections on Researcher Identity and Power: The Impact of Positionality on Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Processes and OutcomesCritical Sociology, 2014
- Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysisSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2011
- The Honest BrokerPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2007
- Using evidencePublished by JSTOR ,2007