The direct and indirect impacts of liberal immigration policies on the United States’ economy
Open Access
- 3 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal
Abstract
Many studies have suggested that stringent labor protections and higher labor costs can limit foreign direct investment (FDI) in host countries. This would imply that the decisions of foreign firms are sensitive to the degree of flexibility in the labor market in the U.S. The U.S. has a steady stream of immigration, which has preserved the stability of the labor supply for the U.S. market. This makes the U.S. a good test case for the relationship between immigration and FDI because it is not only the largest host for FDI but also has the largest immigrant population in the world in absolute terms and is experiencing a significant reduction in labor supply and an increase in the minimum cost of labor. Utilizing a time-series analysis of data from 1970 to 2016, this study suggests that expansive immigration policies directly increase FDI inflows in the U.S. and indirectly increase FDI inflows by lowering labor costs and securing a stable supply of labor.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Democracy, Autocracy, and Expropriation of Foreign Direct InvestmentComparative Political Studies, 2009
- TFP Differences and the Aggregate Effects of Labor Mobility in the Long RunThe B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2007
- Emigrants and Immigrants Networks in FDISSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Migration and Foreign Direct Investment in the Globalization Context: The Case of a Small Open EconomySSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Does Policy Matter? On Governments' Attempts to Control Unwanted MigrationSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Reversal of Fortunes: Democratic Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to Developing CountriesInternational Organization, 2003
- Integration, Foreign Direct Investment and Labour Markets: Microeconomic PerspectivesThe Manchester School, 2002
- A new framework for testing the effect of government spending on growth and productivityPublic Choice, 1994
- The Effects of Rapid Population Growth on Labor Supply and Employment in Developing CountriesPopulation and Development Review, 1986
- Motives of Non-American Firms Investing in the United StatesJournal of International Business Studies, 1981