Patterns of compliance with COVID-19 preventive behaviours: a latent class analysis of 20 000 UK adults
Open Access
- 14 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 76 (3), 247-253
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-216876
Abstract
Background Governments have implemented a range of measures to tackle COVID-19, primarily focusing on changing citizens’ behaviours in order to lower the transmission of the virus. Few studies have looked at the patterns of compliance with different measures within individuals: whether people comply with all measures or selectively choose some but not others. Such research is important for designing interventions to increase compliance. Methods We used cross-sectional data from 20 947 UK adults in the COVID-19 Social Study collected from 17 November to 23 December 2020. Self-report compliance was assessed with six behaviours: mask wearing, hand washing, indoor household mixing, outdoor household mixing, social distancing and compliance with other guidelines. Patterns of compliance behaviour were identified using latent class analysis, and multinomial logistic regression was used to assess demographic, socioeconomic and personality predictors of behaviour patterns. Results We selected a four-latent class solution. Most individuals reported similar levels of compliance across the six behaviour measures. High level of compliance was the modal response. Lower self-reported compliance was related to young age, high risk-taking behaviour, low confidence in government and low empathy, among other factors. Looking at individual behaviours, mask wearing had the highest level of compliance while compliance with social distancing was relatively low. Conclusion Results suggest that individuals choose to comply with all guidelines, rather than some but not others. Strategies to increase compliance should focus on increasing general motivations to comply alongside specifically encouraging social distancing.Keywords
Funding Information
- Nuffield Foundation (WEL/FR-000022583)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P000592/1)
- UK Research and Innovation (ES/S002588/1)
- Wellcome (205407/Z/16/Z, 221400/Z/20/Z)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sociodemographic and Psychological Correlates of Compliance with the COVID-19 Public Health Measures in FranceCanadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 2020
- Don’t get it or don’t spread it: Comparing self-interested versus prosocial motivations for COVID-19 prevention behaviorsPublished by Center for Open Science ,2020
- Cyber Security: Effects of Penalizing Defenders in Cyber-Security Games via Experimentation and Computational ModelingFrontiers in Psychology, 2020
- Population Behavior Patterns in Response to the Risk of Influenza A(H7N9) in Hong Kong, December 2013–February 2014International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2015
- Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using MplusStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2014
- Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the NetherlandsBMC Public Health, 2011
- The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventionsImplementation Science, 2011
- The GLEaMviz computational tool, a publicly available software to explore realistic epidemic spreading scenarios at the global scaleBMC Infectious Diseases, 2011
- Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A reviewBritish Journal of Health Psychology, 2010
- Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviationsStatistics in Medicine, 2007