Application of Qualitative Characteristics to Evaluate Misstatements in Financial Statements: Evidence from Factual Audit Data
Open Access
- 9 September 2022
- journal article
- Published by Vilnius University Press in Ekonomika
- Vol. 101 (2), 6-21
- https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2022.101.2.1
Abstract
The auditor should use qualitative characteristics, which describe the essence of misstatement, while assessing identified misstatements. Final decision depends on the professional judgment made by the auditor, however, auditors may make erroneous decisions or be biased. Previous theoretical research highlighted problems with the application of qualitative characteristics. However, factual audit data is confidential and usually not available for researchers to examine, therefore previous research mostly relied on surveys or experiments and there is little evidence on how auditors behave during real audits (rather than simulations). One audit company agreed to provide us with factual data for this research. The aim of the research is to examine the application of primary qualitative characteristics based on factual audit data. During the research, the audits performed in one Lithuanian audit company for the financial years 2019–2020 were examined as well as summarized official (publicly available) data about audit companies in Lithuania and audits performed by them for 2018–2020 financial years were examined. Firstly, most important primary qualitative characteristics, as well as secondary commonly used characteristics, were singled out. Our further investigation, based on received 2019–2020 factual audit data revealed that some auditors still do not apply primary qualitative characteristics in all cases. Even though we investigated one company and we cannot directly extrapolate results for the whole audit market, but our results are in line with the official and publicly available information about audit companies in Lithuania. Thus, we conclude that our results partly reflect truthful view of factual behavior of audit companies in Lithuania. These results also confirm theoretical research that qualitative characteristics are not sufficiently appreciated.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Materiality judgments in an integrated reporting setting: The effect of strategic relevance and strategy mapAccounting, Organizations and Society, 2018
- The Relationship between Investor Materiality and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Methodological FrameworkSustainability, 2018
- The Joint Role of Auditors' and Auditees' Incentives and Disincentives in the Resolution of Detected MisstatementsAUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2018
- The Last Chance to Improve Financial Reporting Reliability: Evidence from Recorded and Waived Audit AdjustmentsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2018
- The Effect of Real Earnings Management on Auditor Scrutiny of Management's Other Financial Reporting DecisionsThe Accounting Review, 2018
- Offsetting Misstatements: The Effect of Misstatement Distribution, Quantitative Materiality, and Client Pressure on Auditors' JudgmentsThe Accounting Review, 2017
- Significance of Forecast Precision: The Importance of Investors’ ExpectationsContemporary Accounting Research, 2017
- Qualitative Characteristics of Financial Reporting Errors Deemed Immaterial by ManagersSSRN Electronic Journal, 2016
- Evaluating the Intentionality of Identified Misstatements: How Perspective Can Help Auditors in Distinguishing Errors from FraudAUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2016
- Materiality Guidance of the Major Public Accounting FirmsAUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2014