The earlier the better? Or better late than never? Dose optimization in oncology
Open Access
- 15 March 2023
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 115 (5), 485-487
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djad042
Abstract
In this issue of the Journal, Korn et al. ( 1) posit dose optimization during anticancer agent development should occur only after the investigational agent has shown clinical activity and that “patient and public health interests may be better served” if performed after phase II or III testing vs in first-in-human or other early-phase assessments. The title provides a convenient launching point because “whether and when?” are important questions, but for many, including patients, investigators, and the pharmaceutical industry, the most pressing question has been “how?” ( Figure 1).This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dose optimization during drug development: whether and when to optimizeJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022
- All Optimal Dosing Roads Lead to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring—Why Take the Slow LaneJAMA Oncology, 2022
- Oncologists' Perspectives on Individualizing Dose Selection for Patients With Metastatic CancerJCO Oncology Practice, 2022
- Therapeutic drug monitoring-based precision dosing of oral targeted therapies in oncology: a prospective multicenter studyAnnals of Oncology, 2022
- Oncology phase I trial design and conduct: time for a change - MDICT Guidelines 2022Annals of Oncology, 2022
- The Drug-Dosing Conundrum in Oncology — When Less Is MoreThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2021
- Dose derivation of oral anticancer agents: Tolerability in late phase registration trialsEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2020
- Phase I Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents: Should We Pay More Attention to Late Toxicities?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2011