Precommitment Devices: A Defensible Treatment for Opioid Addiction?
- 1 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of Law & Medicine
- Vol. 46 (2-3), 189-202
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0098858820933494
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ten Common Questions (and Their Answers) About Off-label Drug UseMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2012
- Randomized Trial of Long-Acting Sustained-Release Naltrexone Implant vs Oral Naltrexone or Placebo for Preventing Relapse to Opioid DependenceArchives of General Psychiatry, 2012
- Choosing to limit choice: Self-binding directives in Dutch mental health careInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2012
- Naltrexone implants after in-patient treatment for opioid dependence: randomised controlled trialThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2009
- Denying autonomy in order to create it: the paradox of forcing treatment upon addictsAddiction, 2008
- The use of depot naltrexone under legal coercion: the case for cautionAddiction, 2008
- Psychiatric advance directives and reduction of coercive crisis interventionsJournal of Mental Health, 2008
- MAKING A CLEAN BREAK: ADDICTION AND ULYSSES CONTRACTSBioethics, 2007
- Reviving Ulysses ContractsKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2003
- Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approachJournal of Medical Ethics, 2001