A phase 1 study of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies
Open Access
- 29 January 2015
- Vol. 121 (10), 1645-1653
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29224
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired resistance to antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR) therapy may be caused by EGFR–v‐erb‐b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ErbB2) heterodimerization and pathway reactivation. In preclinical studies, inhibiting ErbB2 blocked this resistance mechanism and resensitized cells to anti‐EGFR therapy. Cetuximab targets EGFR, whereas lapatinib inhibits both EGFR and ErbB2. The objective of this phase 1 trial was to assess the safety, dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs), and maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with solid tumors. METHODS Patients received standard weekly cetuximab with escalating lapatinib doses of 750 mg, 1000 mg, or 1250 mg daily in 3‐week cycles. DLTs were monitored through the end of cycle 2. Pretreatment and post‐treatment tumor biopsies and germline DNA samples were obtained for correlative studies. RESULTS Twenty‐two patients were enrolled, and 18 patients each were evaluable for toxicity and response. Fifty‐nine percent of patients had received prior anti‐EGFR therapy. Common toxicities included rash and diarrhea. No patient experienced a DLT at the highest dose level, and no grade 4 toxicity was observed. Response included no complete responses, 3 partial responses, 9 patients with stable disease, and 6 patients with disease progression, for an overall response rate of 17% and a clinical benefit rate of 67%. The clinical benefit rate in patients who had previously received anti‐EGFR therapy was 70%. The mean treatment duration was 4.7 cycles (range, 1‐14 cycles). Decreased expression of EGFR/ErbB2 pathway components after treatment was correlated with response, whereas increased expression in the PI3K, Jak/Stat, and MAPK pathways occurred in nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS The combination of cetuximab and lapatinib was well tolerated, had the expected toxicities, and exhibited notable clinical activity, including in patients who had received previous anti‐EGFR therapy. Further clinical study of this combination is warranted. Cancer 2015;121:1645–1653. © 2015 American Cancer Society.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (p30ca051008)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Activation of ERBB2 Signaling Causes Resistance to the EGFR-Directed Therapeutic Antibody CetuximabScience Translational Medicine, 2011
- Randomized Phase II Multicenter Trial of Two Schedules of Lapatinib as First- or Second-Line Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung CancerClinical Cancer Research, 2010
- Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab (STEPP), a Phase II, Open-Label, Randomized Trial Evaluating the Impact of a Pre-Emptive Skin Treatment Regimen on Skin Toxicities and Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Dual Inhibition of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway with Cetuximab and Erlotinib: A Phase I Study in Patients with Advanced Solid MalignanciesThe Oncologist, 2009
- Platinum-Based Chemotherapy plus Cetuximab in Head and Neck CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Phase I Dose Escalation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lapatinib in Combination With Trastuzumab in Patients With Advanced ErbB2-Positive Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Combined lapatinib and cetuximab enhance cytotoxicity against gefitinib-resistant lung cancer cellsMolecular Cancer Therapeutics, 2008
- Mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab: role of HER (ErbB) family membersOncogene, 2008
- Toward individualized treatment: prediction of anticancer drug disposition and toxicity with pharmacogeneticsAnti-Cancer Drugs, 2007
- A Novel Mechanism of Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antagonism In vivoCancer Research, 2007