The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor
- 9 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Vol. 37 (2), 322-327
- https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000004263
Abstract
Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322–327, 2023—Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FRvibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FRvibration) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly (p < 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM (d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness (d = −1.25, d = −1.09, d = −1.18, and d = −1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS (p = 0.05, d = −0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lower Limb Neuromuscular Asymmetry in Volleyball and Basketball PlayersJournal of Human Kinetics, 2016
- Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic reviewApplied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 2016
- Can passive stretch inhibit motoneuron facilitation in the human plantar flexors?Journal of Applied Physiology, 2014
- Acute Effects of Static Stretching on Muscle Hardness of the Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle Belly in Humans: An Ultrasonic Shear-Wave Elastography StudyJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2014
- The Effects of Myofascial Release With Foam Rolling on PerformanceJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2014
- Acute Effects of Self-Myofascial Release Using a Foam Roller on Arterial FunctionJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2014
- Does pre‐exercise static stretching inhibit maximal muscular performance? A meta‐analytical reviewScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2012
- Viscoelasticity of the muscle–tendon unit is returned more rapidly than range of motion after stretchingScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2011
- A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performanceEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2011
- Increasing Muscle Extensibility: A Matter of Increasing Length or Modifying Sensation?PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2010