Perception and knowledge of Saudi women about water birth: A cross-sectional study
Open Access
- 21 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Belitung Raya Foundation in Belitung Nursing Journal
- Vol. 8 (5), 422-430
- https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2185
Abstract
Background: Water birth has been considered an efficient non-pharmacological modality with numerous maternal and neonatal benefits as well as rare complications. Perception and knowledge about water birth can affect women's decisions in the future. Few available studies addressed this area in Saudi Arabia. Thus, the current research fills this gap and contributes to further understanding this phenomenon.Objective: This study aimed to assess the perception and knowledge of Saudi women about water birth. Methods: A cross-sectional study was employed among 388 Saudi women conveniently enrolled for the study. An online questionnaire that included four sections: sociodemographic characteristics, obstetrical history, perception, and knowledge of water birth, was used for data collection. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations) and inferential statistics (Chi-Square, Fisher Exact, and t-tests) were used for data analysis.Results: The participants' mean age was 34.91 +/- 8.851, with 83.2% of them highly educated. The mean number of deliveries was 3.36 +/- 2.167, with 60% having no history of abortion. Less than half of the participants (40.2%) preferred to have a water delivery. Of the total participants, 96.4% had a fair knowledge level, and 3.6% had a good knowledge of water delivery. A significant relationship was found between age, educational course, and the knowledge of the participants about water delivery (p <0.05).Conclusion: Most Saudi women had a fair knowledge of water birth; however, they wanted more information on it. It is recommended that midwives and nurses broaden their understanding of water birth and enhance its practice in order to educate and inspire women to make informed decisions about all available childbirth delivery methods, including water birth.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- What are the benefits? Are they concerned? Women's experiences of water immersion for labor and birthMidwifery, 2019
- Waterbirth in Sweden – a comparative studyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2018
- The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirthBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2018
- Infant feeding practices within a large electronic medical record databaseBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2018
- Effect of water immersion on labor outcomes: A randomized clinical trialNursing and Midwifery Studies, 2018
- The influence of water birth on newborns' condition in early adaptation periodAnnales Academiae Medicae Silesiensis, 2017
- A Retrospective Study of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Following Conventional and Water Birth in EcuadorGlobal Journal of Health Science, 2016
- A comparative study between the pioneer cohort of waterbirths and conventional vaginal deliveries in an obstetrician-led unit in SingaporeTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016
- A Comparison of Mothers’ Quality of Life after Normal Vaginal, Cesarean, and Water Birth Deliveries2015
- Determination and Quantification Of Content ValidityNursing Research, 1986