An Acute Stress Scale for Health Care Professionals Caring for Patients With COVID-19: Validation Study (Preprint)
Preprint
- 12 January 2021
- preprint
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the response capacity of the health care workforce, and health care professionals have been experiencing acute stress reactions since the beginning of the pandemic. In Spain, the first wave was particularly severe among the population and health care professionals, many of whom were infected. These professionals required initial psychological supports that were gradual and in line with their conditions. OBJECTIVE In the early days of the pandemic in Spain (March 2020), this study aimed to design and validate a scale to measure acute stress experienced by the health care workforce during the care of patients with COVID-19: the Self-applied Acute Stress Scale (EASE). METHODS Item development, scale development, and scale evaluation were considered. Qualitative research was conducted to produce the initial pool of items, assure their legibility, and assess the validity of the content. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach α and McDonald ω. Confirmatory factor analysis and the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test were used to assess construct validity. Linear regression was applied to assess criterion validity. Back-translation methodology was used to translate the scale into Portuguese and English. RESULTS A total of 228 health professionals from the Spanish public health system responded to the 10 items of the EASE scale. Internal consistency was .87 (McDonald ω). Goodness-of-fit indices confirmed a two-factor structure, explaining 55% of the variance. As expected, the highest level of stress was found among professionals working in health services where a higher number of deaths from COVID-19 occurred (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS The EASE scale was shown to have adequate metric properties regarding consistency and construct validity. The EASE scale could be used to determine the levels of acute stress among the health care workforce in order to give them proportional support according to their needs during emergency conditions, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.Keywords
Other Versions
- Published version: Version JMIR Formative Research, 5, preprints
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019The New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Veterans’ perspectives on discussing moral injury in the context of evidence‐based psychotherapies for PTSD and other VA treatmentJournal of Clinical Psychology, 2019
- Reflections: Addressing the Quadruple Aim in Social Emergency MedicineAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2019
- Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A PrimerFrontiers in Public Health, 2018
- Acute stress and subsequent health outcomes: A systematic reviewJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2018
- The Quadruple Aim: care, health, cost and meaning in workBMJ Quality & Safety, 2015
- From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the ProviderAnnals of Family Medicine, 2014
- Standards and Guidelines for Validation Practices: Development and Evaluation of Measurement InstrumentsPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2014
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 2010
- The Triple Aim: Care, Health, And CostHealth Affairs, 2008