A Relational Theory of Reputational Stability and Change
- 16 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Organization Science
- Vol. 33 (5), 1724-1740
- https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1494
Abstract
An ongoing discussion in organizational studies has focused on the path-dependent nature of organizational reputation. To date, however, there has been little explanation about when and why some constituents’ reputation judgments remain stable, whereas others are more prone to change. We contribute to this research by developing a relational theory of reputational stability and change. Our fundamental argument is that differences in constituent-organization relationships, as well as in the reputational communities that surround these relationships, affect the stability and change of reputation judgments. First, we highlight three relationship characteristics—favorability, history, and directness—and theorize that the reputation judgments of constituents with more unfavorable, longer, and more direct relationships with an organization are more stable, whereas the reputation judgments of constituents with more favorable, shorter, and more indirect relationships with the organization are less stable. We then develop the concept of reputational communities as a key source of indirect information about organizations. We highlight that the immediacy, size, and level of agreement within reputational communities affect how influential they are in changing individual constituents’ reputation judgments. Specifically, we propose that more immediate and larger reputational communities with a higher level of agreement are most likely to change individual constituents’ reputation judgments, whereas more distant and smaller reputational communities with a lower level of agreement are least likely to do so. Overall, we position constituents’ relationships with an organization and the communities that surround these relationships as central elements for understanding reputational stability and change.Keywords
This publication has 85 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managing the Message: The Effects of Firm Actions and Industry Spillovers on Media Coverage Following WrongdoingThe Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- Toward Understanding Consumer Processing of Negative Online Word-of-Mouth CommunicationJournal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 2012
- Watchdog or Lapdog? A Behavioral View of the Media as a Corporate Governance MechanismThe Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizationsResearch in Organizational Behavior, 2011
- How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of ObjectsCurrent Biology, 2010
- An Organizational Impression Management Perspective on the Formation of Corporate ReputationsJournal of Management, 2009
- Is There a Substitute for Direct Experience? Comparing Consumers' Preferences after Direct and Indirect Product ExperiencesJournal of Consumer Research, 2007
- When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchorsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2005
- A Social Actor Conception of Organizational Identity and Its Implications for the Study of Organizational ReputationBusiness & Society, 2002
- Relative influence of positive and negative information in impression formation and persistence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967