Early-rectal Cancer Treatment: A Decision-tree Making Based on Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- 13 February 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Cirugía Española
- Vol. 99 (2), 89-107
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2021.02.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- For Patients with Early Rectal Cancer, Does Local Excision Have an Impact on Recurrence, Survival, and Quality of Life Relative to Radical Resection?Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019
- Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in OncologyJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2018
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or bothBMJ, 2017
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of local resection or transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus radical resection in stage i rectal cancer: A real standard?Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2017
- Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based reviewSurgical Endoscopy, 2016
- Comparison of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery and Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of T1 Rectal Cancer: A Meta-AnalysisPLOS ONE, 2015
- Local Resection Compared With Radical Resection in the Treatment of T1N0M0 Rectal AdenocarcinomaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2015
- Oncological outcomes of local excision compared with radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014
- Systematic review and meta‐analysis of published trials comparing the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection in the management of early rectal cancerColorectal Disease, 2013
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011