Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open Access
- 8 April 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
- Vol. 8 (1), e001150
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001150
Abstract
The quality of evidence that psychological interventions are effective in improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is weak. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions in T2D to assess whether their effectiveness in improving glycemic levels has improved over the past 30 years. We applied the protocol of a systematic review and aggregate meta-analysis conducted to January 2003. We added network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare intervention and control group type against usual care. MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Database, Web of Science, and Dissertation Abstracts International were searched from January 2003 to July 2018. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) of psychological interventions for adults with T2D reported in any language were included. The primary outcome was change in glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in mmol/mol). Data were extracted from study reports and authors were contacted for missing data. 94 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review since the last review. In 70 RCTs (n=14 796 participants) the pooled mean difference in HbA1c in those randomized to psychological intervention compared with control group was −0.19 (95% CI −0.25 to −0.12), equivalent to a reduction in HbA1c of 3.7 mmol/mol, with moderate heterogeneity across studies (I2=64.7%, pPROSPERO registration number CRD42016033619.Keywords
Funding Information
- Health Technology Assessment Programme (12/213/10)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regressionResearch Synthesis Methods, 2012
- Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studiesResearch Synthesis Methods, 2012
- One-year postcollaborative depression care trial outcomes among predominantly Hispanic diabetes safety net patientsGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 2011
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Major ingredients of fidelity: A review and scientific guide to improving quality of intervention research implementationClinical Psychology Review, 2011
- A critical review of the literature on fear of hypoglycemia in diabetes: Implications for diabetes management and patient educationPatient Education and Counseling, 2007
- Binge Eating Disorder and Night Eating Syndrome in Adults with Type 2 DiabetesObesity, 2007
- Prevalence of anxiety in adults with diabetesJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2002
- A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000