Strategies to encourage freestall use in dairy heifers
Open Access
- 9 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Dairy Science Association in JDS Communications
- Vol. 2 (6), 403-408
- https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-0118
Abstract
Dairy cattle can experience problems adjusting to freestalls when first introduced, resulting in a marked reduction in lying time and increased abnormal behaviors such as lying in the alley or lying backward in a stall. Our objective was to evaluate 2 strategies to ease the transition of heifers to freestalls: using an older, experienced heifer as a social model [experiment (Exp.) 1] or using brushes mounted in the stalls as an attractant (Exp. 2). In Exp. 1, 44 naïve heifers (129 ± 37 d of age, mean ± standard deviation) were assigned in pairs (n = 11 pairs/treatment) to either the control or social model (with an older heifer, 200 ± 24 d of age, as an experienced social companion) treatments. In Exp. 2, 52 naïve heifers (146 ± 9 d of age) were preassigned in pairs (n = 13 pairs/treatment) to either control or brush treatments. In both studies, heifers were initially housed in pens with a bedded pack (for 5 and 7 d in Exp. 1 and 2, respectively) before moving to pens in the same barn with sand-bedded freestalls. On d -2, 0, and 4 relative to the move to the freestalls, standing, perching (with the front hooves on the bedding and rear hooves in the alley), and lying (location: bedding vs. alley; direction in stall on d 0 and 4: forward or backward) were recorded at 5-min intervals. In addition, starting on d 0 relative to the move, latency to first lie down in a stall was recorded continuously. In both studies, time budgets did not differ between treatments. On the day heifers were moved, they spent less time lying relative to d -2 [Exp. 1: -1.8 h/d, standard error (SE): 0.4 h/d; Exp. 2: -3.0 h/d, SE: 0.3 h/d] and more time standing and perching. By d 4, lying and standing returned to d -2 baseline levels, although heifers continued to spend more time perching. When heifers moved to freestalls, no treatment differences were observed in the latency to lie down in a stall, but latencies differed between Exp. 1 (averaging approximately 3.8 h across treatments) and Exp. 2 (averaging 31.4 h across treatments). After moving to freestalls, the percentage of total lying time that heifers spent facing forward in a stall increased (Exp. 2: 53 vs. 77%, SE: 7%) or tended to (Exp. 1: 84 vs. 92%, SE: 3%) between d 0 and 4 of exposure, with no effect of treatment. Although lying behavior improved with days of exposure to freestalls, some heifers continued to lie down in the alley or backward in a stall, suggesting the need for additional work to ease the adjustment to freestall housing.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dairy heifers benefit from the presence of an experienced companion when learning how to grazeJournal of Dairy Science, 2016
- Presence of an older weaned companion influences feeding behavior and improves performance of dairy calves before and after weaning from milkJournal of Dairy Science, 2012
- Flexible and fixed partitions in freestalls—Effects on lying behavior and cow preferenceJournal of Dairy Science, 2011
- Introducing heifers to freestall housingJournal of Dairy Science, 2011
- Foraging behavior of heifers with or without social models in an unfamiliar site containing high plant diversityLivestock Science, 2010
- The stall-design paradox: Neck rails increase lameness but improve udder and stall hygieneJournal of Dairy Science, 2009
- Effects of social learning on foraging behaviour and live weight gain in first-season grazing calvesApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 2009
- Relationship Between Udder and Leg Hygiene Scores and Subclinical MastitisJournal of Dairy Science, 2003
- Cubicle Refusal in Norwegian Dairy HerdsActa Veterinaria Scandinavica, 2001
- Weanling training and cubicle usage as heifersApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 1993