Contralateral Eye Comparison of SMILE and Flap-Based Corneal Refractive Surgery: Computational Analysis of Biomechanical Impact
- 1 July 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SLACK, Inc. in Journal of Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 33 (7), 444-453
- https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20170504-01
Abstract
PURPOSE: Computational analyses were performed to quantify and directly compare the biomechanical impact of flapless and flap-based procedures in a series of patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in one eye and flap-based femtosecond lenticule extraction in the other. METHODS: Tomographic data from 10 eyes of 5 patients undergoing femtosecond laser refractive lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism with or without a stromal flap (femtosecond lenticule extraction in one eye, SMILE in the contralateral eye) were used to generate computational models. Inverse finite element analyses were performed at physiologic intraocular pressure followed by forward analyses at elevated intraocular pressure to assess corneal displacement and stress under differential loading. Case-specific treatment settings were incorporated. Preoperative material constants were obtained through inverse finite element analyses, and the surgically induced change in fiber stiffness within each flap was determined by minimization of the error between the simulated and actual 6-month topographic outcomes. RESULTS: Flap-based procedures produced a 49% (range: 2% to 87%) greater mean reduction in effective stromal collagen fiber stiffness within the flap region than contralateral SMILE cases. Lower stresses and deformations were observed within the residual stromal bed in SMILE cases than in flap-based cases. Stromal bed displacements and stresses were more affected by a loading increase in flap-based eyes than flapless eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Intrastromal flapless procedures had less impact on anterior stromal collagen mechanics and resulted in lower stromal bed displacements and stresses than flap-based procedures in contralateral eyes. However, biomechanical impact varied widely between individuals and this reinforces the need for individualized assessment of ectasia risk. [ J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):444–453].Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonlinear Optical Macroscopic Assessment of 3-D Corneal Collagen Organization and Axial BiomechanicsInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2011
- Patient-Specific Computational Modeling of Keratoconus Progression and Differential Responses to Collagen Cross-linkingInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2011
- Patient-Specific Modeling of Corneal Refractive Surgery Outcomes and Inverse Estimation of Elastic Property ChangesJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2010
- Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective studyBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010
- Biomechanical analysis of the keratoconic corneaJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2009
- LASIK World Literature Review: Quality of Life and Patient SatisfactionOphthalmology, 2009
- Keratoconus prediction using a finite element model of the cornea with local biomechanical propertiesArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 2009
- Three-Dimensional Modeling and Computational Analysis of the Human Cornea Considering Distributed Collagen Fibril OrientationsJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2008
- Second-Harmonic Imaging Microscopy of Normal Human and Keratoconus CorneaInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2007
- Computational modeling of mechanical anisotropy in the cornea and scleraJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005