What do clinicians want? Understanding frontline addiction treatment clinicians’ preferences and priorities to improve the design of measurement-based care technology
Open Access
- 15 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
- Vol. 16 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-021-00247-5
Abstract
Background: Measurement-based care (MBC) is the practice of routinely administering standardized measures to support clinical decision-making and monitor treatment progress. Despite evidence of its effectiveness, MBC is rarely adopted in routine substance use disorder (SUD) treatment settings and little is known about the factors that may improve its adoptability in these settings. The current study gathered qualitative data from SUD treatment clinicians about their perceptions of MBC, the clinical outcomes they would most like to monitor in MBC, and suggestions for the design and implementation of MBC systems in their settings. Methods: Fifteen clinicians from one publicly-funded and two privately-funded outpatient SUD treatment clinics participated in one-on-one research interviews. Interviews focused on clinicians’ perceived benefits, drawbacks, and ideas related to implementing MBC technology into their clinical workflows. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded to allow for thematic analysis using a mixed deductive and inductive approach. Clinicians also completed a card sorting task to rate the perceived helpfulness of routinely measuring and monitoring different treatment outcomes. Results: Clinicians reported several potential benefits of MBC, including improved patient-provider communication, client empowerment, and improved communication between clinicians. Clinicians also expressed potential drawbacks, including concerns about subjectivity in patient self-reports, limits to personalization, increased time burdens, and needing to learn to use new technologies. Clinicians generated several ideas and preferences aimed at minimizing burden of MBC, illustrating clinical changes over time, improving ease of use, and improving personalization. Numerous patient outcomes were identified as “very helpful” to track, including coping skills, social support, and motivation for change. Conclusions: MBC may be a beneficial tool for improving clinical care in SUD treatment settings. MBC tools may be particularly adoptable if they are compatible with existing workflows, help illustrate gradual and nonlinear progress in SUD treatment, measure outcomes perceived as clinically useful, accommodate multiple use cases and stakeholder groups, and are framed as an additional source of information meant to augment, rather than replace, existing practices and information sources.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K01AA024796, K02AA023814)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integrating the Use of Patient‐Reported Outcomes for Both Clinical Practice and Performance Measurement: Views of Experts from 3 CountriesThe Milbank Quarterly, 2014
- Results of a Pilot Test of a Self-Administered Smartphone-Based Treatment System for Alcohol Use Disorders: Usability and Early OutcomesSubstance Abuse, 2014
- How should we measure addiction recovery? Analysis of service provider perspectives using online Delphi groupsDrugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 2014
- Using Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Any TreatmentCognitive and Behavioral Practice, 2014
- Progress monitoring in mental health and addiction treatment: A means of improving care.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2013
- Recent Advances in Behavioral Addiction Treatments: Focusing on Mechanisms of ChangeCurrent Psychiatry Reports, 2011
- Understanding Barriers to Evidence-Based Assessment: Clinician Attitudes Toward Standardized Assessment ToolsJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 2010
- How do people recover from alcohol dependence? A systematic review of the research on mechanisms of behavior change in Alcoholics AnonymousAddiction Research & Theory, 2009
- The qualitative content analysis processJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2008
- QDA Miner 2.0: Mixed-Model Qualitative Data Analysis SoftwareField Methods, 2007