Detection of Diabetes Status and Type in Youth Using Electronic Health Records: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study

Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diabetes surveillance often requires manual medical chart reviews to confirm status and type. This project aimed to create an electronic health record (EHR)-based procedure for improving surveillance efficiency through automation of case identification. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Youth (0.95), specificity (Sp) (>0.96), and positive predictive value (PPV) (>0.97). In contrast, the PPVs for type 2 diabetes were 0.642 and 0.778 for the rule-based algorithm and the multinomial regression, respectively. Combination of the rule-based method with chart reviews (n = 695, 7.9%) of persons predicted to have non–type 1 diabetes resulted in perfect PPV for the cases reviewed while increasing overall accuracy (0.983). The Se, Sp, and PPV for type 2 diabetes using the combined method were ≥0.91. CONCLUSIONS An ICD-10 algorithm combined with targeted chart reviews accurately identified diabetes status/type and could be an attractive option for diabetes surveillance in youth.
Funding Information
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (00097, DP-05-069, DP-10-001)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1UC4DK108173, 1U18DP006131, U18DP006133, U18DP006134, U18DP006136, U18DP006138, U18DP006139, U18DP006133, U48/CCU919219, U01 DP000246, U18DP002714, U18DP006139, U48/CCU819241-3, U01 DP000247, U18DP000247-06A1, U18DP006134, U48/CCU519239, U01DP000248, 1U18DP002709, U18DP006138, U48/CCU419249, U01 DP000254, U18DP002708, U18DP006136, U58/CCU019235-4, U01 DP000244, U18DP002710-01, U18DP006131, U18 DP006131 S1, U48/CCU919219, U01 DP000250, 200-2010-35171)

This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit: