Group processes and interoperability: A longitudinal case study analysis of the UK's civil contingency response to Covid‐19
Open Access
- 7 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
- Vol. 31 (1), 121-133
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12424
Abstract
Our case study explored a Local Resilience Forum's (LRF) civil contingency response to COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. We undertook 19 semistructured ethnographic longitudinal interviews, between March 25, 2020 and February 17, 2021, with a Director of a Civil Contingencies Unit and a Chief Fire Officer who both played key roles within their LRF. Within these interviews, we focused on their strategic level decision-making and how their relationship with national government impacted on local processes and outcomes. Using a form of grounded theory, our data describe the chronological evolution of an increasingly effective localized approach toward outbreak control and a growing resilience in dealing with concurrent emergency incidents. However, we also highlight how national government organizations imposed central control on aspects of the response in ways that undermined or misaligned with local preparedness. Thus, during emergencies, central governments can undermine the principle of subsidiarity and damage the ways in which LRFs can help scaffold local resilience. Our work contributes to the theoretical understanding of the social psychological factors that can shape the behaviour of responder agencies during a prolonged crisis. In particular, the implications of our analysis for advancing our conceptual understanding of strategic decision-making during emergencies are discussed.Keywords
Funding Information
- UK Research and Innovation (ES/V005383/1)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- When is policing fair? Groups, identity and judgements of the procedural justice of coercive crowd policingPolicing and Society, 2016
- Decision inertia: Deciding between least worst outcomes in emergency responses to disastersJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2015
- The impact of accountability on motivational goals and the quality of advice provided in crisis negotiations.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2013
- A systematic review of the potential hurdles of interoperability to the emergency services in major incidents: recommendations for solutions and alternativesCognition, Technology & Work, 2013
- The effects of subjective time pressure and individual differences on hypotheses generation and action prioritization in police investigations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2013
- Introduction to Applied Thematic AnalysisPublished by SAGE Publications ,2012
- How Uncertainty and Accountability can Derail Strategic ‘Save Life’ Decisions in Counter‐Terrorism Simulations: A Descriptive Model of Choice Deferral and Omission BiasJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2010
- Accountability processes and group dynamics: a SIDE perspective on the policing of an anti‐capitalist riotEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2008
- A study of the factors that influence how senior officers police crowd events: On SIDE outside the laboratoryBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2006
- Intergroup behaviour, self‐stereotyping and the salience of social categoriesBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1987