High-Throughput SAXS for the Characterization of Biomolecules in Solution: A Practical Approach
- 12 October 2013
- book chapter
- protocol
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Vol. 1091, 245-258
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-691-7_18
Abstract
The recent innovation of collecting X-ray scattering from solutions containing purified macromolecules in high-throughput has yet to be truly exploited by the biological community. Yet, this capability is becoming critical given that the growth of sequence and genomics data is significantly outpacing structural biology results. Given the huge mismatch in information growth rates between sequence and structural methods, their combined high-throughput and high success rate make high-throughput small angle X-ray scattering (HT-SAXS) analyses increasingly valuable. HT-SAXS connects sequence as well as NMR and crystallographic results to biological outcomes by defining the flexible and dynamic complexes controlling cell biology. Commonly falling under the umbrella of bio-SAXS, HT-SAXS data collection pipelines have or are being developed at most synchrotrons. How investigators practically get their biomolecules of interest into these pipelines, balance sample requirements and manage HT-SAXS data output format varies from facility to facility. While these features are unlikely to be standardized across synchrotron beamlines, a detailed description of HT-SAXS issues for one pipeline provides investigators with a practical guide to the general procedures they will encounter. One of the longest running and generally accessible HT-SAXS endstations is the SIBYLS beamline at the Advanced Light Source in Berkeley CA. Here we describe the current state of the SIBYLS HT-SAXS pipeline, what is necessary for investigators to integrate into it, the output format and a summary of results from 2 years of operation. Assessment of accumulated data informs issues of concentration, background, buffers, sample handling, sample shipping, homogeneity requirements, error sources, aggregation, radiation sensitivity, interpretation, and flags for concern. By quantitatively examining success and failures as a function of sample and data characteristics, we define practical concerns, considerations, and concepts for optimally applying HT-SAXS techniques to biological samples.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comprehensive macromolecular conformations mapped by quantitative SAXS analysesNature Methods, 2013
- A Mechanism for Tunable Autoinhibition in the Structure of a Human Ca2+/Calmodulin- Dependent Kinase II HoloenzymeCell, 2011
- XRCC4 Protein Interactions with XRCC4-like Factor (XLF) Create an Extended Grooved Scaffold for DNA Ligation and Double Strand Break RepairOnline Journal of Public Health Informatics, 2011
- Characterizing flexible and intrinsically unstructured biological macromolecules by SAS using the Porod‐Debye lawPeptide Science, 2011
- XLF Regulates Filament Architecture of the XRCC4·Ligase IV ComplexStructure, 2010
- Bridging the solution divide: comprehensive structural analyses of dynamic RNA, DNA, and protein assemblies by small-angle X-ray scatteringCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology, 2010
- Nbs1 Flexibly Tethers Ctp1 and Mre11-Rad50 to Coordinate DNA Double-Strand Break Processing and RepairCell, 2009
- Robust, high-throughput solution structural analyses by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)Nature Methods, 2009
- X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation: defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in solutionQuarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 2007
- Hexameric structures of the archaeal secretion ATPase GspE and implications for a universal secretion mechanismThe EMBO Journal, 2007