A survey of proximal methods for monitoring leaf phenology in temperate deciduous forests
Open Access
- 7 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Biogeosciences (online)
- Vol. 18 (11), 3391-3408
- https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3391-2021
Abstract
Tree phenology is a major driver of forest–atmosphere mass and energy exchanges. Yet, tree phenology has rarely been monitored in a consistent way throughout the life of a flux-tower site. Here, we used seasonal time series of ground-based NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), RGB camera GCC (greenness chromatic coordinate), broadband NDVI, LAI (leaf area index), fAPAR (fraction of absorbed photosynthetic active radiation), CC (canopy closure), fRvis (fraction of reflected radiation) and GPP (gross primary productivity) to predict six phenological markers detecting the start, middle and end of budburst and of leaf senescence in a temperate deciduous forest using an asymmetric double sigmoid function (ADS) fitted to the time series. We compared them to observations of budburst and leaf senescence achieved by field phenologists over a 13-year period. GCC, NDVI and CC captured the interannual variability of spring phenology very well (R2>0.80) and provided the best estimates of the observed budburst dates, with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of less than 4 d. For the CC and GCC methods, mid-amplitude (50 %) threshold dates during spring phenological transition agreed well with the observed phenological dates. For the NDVI-based method, on average, the mean observed date coincides with the date when NDVI reaches 25 % of its amplitude of annual variation. For the other methods, MAD ranges from 6 to 17 d. The ADS method used to derive the phenological markers provides the most biased estimates for the GPP and GCC. During the leaf senescence stage, NDVI- and CC-derived dates correlated significantly with observed dates (R2=0.63 and 0.80 for NDVI and CC, respectively), with an MAD of less than 7 d. Our results show that proximal-sensing methods can be used to derive robust phenological metrics. They can be used to retrieve long-term phenological series at eddy covariance (EC) flux measurement sites and help interpret the interannual variability and trends of mass and energy exchanges.Keywords
Other Versions
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Green pointillism”: detecting the within-population variability of budburst in temperate deciduous trees with phenological camerasInternational Journal of Biometeorology, 2020
- Using Ordinary Digital Cameras in Place of Near-Infrared Sensors to Derive Vegetation Indices for Phenology Studies of High Arctic VegetationRemote Sensing, 2016
- Wood phenology, not carbon input, controls the interannual variability of wood growth in a temperate oak forestNew Phytologist, 2015
- Modelling interannual and spatial variability of leaf senescence for three deciduous tree species in FranceAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009
- Exceptional carbon uptake in European forests during the warm spring of 2007: a data–model analysisGlobal Change Biology, 2009
- Responses of spring phenology to climate changeNew Phytologist, 2004
- FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem–Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux DensitiesBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2001
- The Light Environment of Plant CanopiesPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1998
- Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distributionAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1986
- Solar radiation within an oak—hickory forest: an evaluation of the extinction coefficients for several radiation components during fully-leafed and leafless periodsAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1984