Let's jump in: A phylogenetic study of the great basin springfishes and poolfishes, Crenichthys and Empetrichthys (Cyprinodontiformes: Goodeidae)
Open Access
- 27 October 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 12 (10), e0185425
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185425
Abstract
North America’s Great Basin has long been of interest to biologists due to its high level of organismal endemicity throughout its endorheic watersheds. One example of such a group is the subfamily Empetricthyinae. In this paper, we analyzed the relationships of the Empetrichtyinae and assessed the validity of the subspecies designations given by Williams and Wilde within the group using concatenated phylogenetic tree estimation and species tree estimation. Samples from 19 populations were included covering the entire distribution of the three extant species of Empetricthyinae–Crenichthys nevadae, Crenichthys baileyi and Empetricthys latos. Three nuclear introns (S8 intron 4, S7 intron 1, and P0 intron 1) and one mitochondrial gene (Cytb) were sequenced for phylogenetic analysis. Using these sequences, we generated two separate hypotheses of the evolutionary relationships of Empetrichtyinae- one based on the mitochondrial data and one based on the nuclear data using Bayesian phylogenetics. Haplotype networks were also generated to look at the relationships of the populations within Empetrichthyinae. After comparing the two phylogenetic hypotheses, species trees were generated using *BEAST with the nuclear data to further test the validity of the subspecies within Empetrichthyinae. The mitochondrial analyses supported four lineages within C. baileyi and 2 within C. nevadae. The concatenated nuclear tree was more conserved, supporting one clade and an unresolved polytomy in both species. The species tree analysis supported the presence of two species within both C. baileyi and C. nevadae. Based on the results of these analyses, the subspecies designations of Williams and Wilde are not valid, rather a conservative approach suggests there are two species within C. nevadae and two species within C. baileyi. No structure was found for E. latos or the populations of Empetricthyinae. This study represents one of many demonstrating the invalidity of subspecies and their detriment to species identification, conservation, and understanding.Funding Information
- Division of Environmental Biology (1354930)
- Nevada Department of Wildlife (US)
- Edward G. Schlieder Foundation
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence dataBioinformatics, 2012
- Bayesian Phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2012
- PartitionFinder: Combined Selection of Partitioning Schemes and Substitution Models for Phylogenetic AnalysesMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2012
- Bayesian species delimitation in West African forest geckos (Hemidactylus fasciatus)Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2010
- Bayesian Inference of Species Trees from Multilocus DataMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2009
- Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous FishesFisheries, 2008
- jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model AveragingMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2008
- Phylogenetic relationships within the fish family Goodeidae based on cytochrome b sequence dataMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2004
- Are the Endangered Springfish (Crenichthys Hubbs) and Poolfish (Empetrichthys Gilbert) Fundulines or Goodeids?: A Mitochondrial DNA AssessmentIchthyology & Herpetology, 1995
- Extinctions of North American Fishes During the past CenturyFisheries, 1989