An optimized stepwise algorithm combining rapid antigen and RT-qPCR for screening of COVID-19 patients
Open Access
- 23 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (9), e0257817
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257817
Abstract
We investigated the combination of rapid antigen detection (RAD) and RT-qPCR assays in a stepwise procedure to optimize the detection of COVID-19. From August 2020 to November 2020, 43,399 patients were screened in our laboratory for COVID-19 diagnostic by RT-qPCR using nasopharyngeal swab. Overall, 4,691 of the 43,399 were found to be positive, and 200 were retrieved for RAD testing allowing comparison of diagnostic accuracy between RAD and RT-qPCR. Cycle threshold (Ct) and time from symptoms onset (TSO) were included as covariates. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR-, and LR+ of RAD compared with RT-qPCR were 72% (95%CI 62%–81%), 99% (95% CI95%–100%), 99% (95%CI 93%–100%), and 78% (95%CI 70%–85%), 0.28 (95%CI 0.21–0.39), and 72 (95%CI 10–208) respectively. Sensitivity was higher for patients with Ct ≤ 25 regardless of TSO: TSO ≤ 4 days 92% (95%CI 75%–99%), TSO > 4 days 100% (95%CI 54%–100%), and asymptomatic 100% (95%CI 78–100%). Overall, combining RAD and RT-qPCR would allow reducing from only 4% the number of RT-qPCR needed. This study highlights the risk of misdiagnosing COVID-19 in 28% of patients if RAD is used alone. A stepwise analysis that combines RAD and RT-qPCR would be an efficient screening procedure for COVID-19 detection and may facilitate the control of the outbreak.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since ExposureAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2020
- Evaluation of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen in Nasopharyngeal SwabsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Comparative Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Assays Using Seven Different Primer-Probe Sets and One Assay KitJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosisJournal of Clinical Virology, 2020
- The relative transmissibility of asymptomatic COVID-19 infections among close contactsInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019Nature, 2020
- Viral dynamics in mild and severe cases of COVID-19The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020
- SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Rapid Tests for Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2017
- Selection of a Cutoff Value for Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Results to Fit a Diagnostic Purpose: Analytical and Epidemiologic ApproachesJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 2011